Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Glam-Breakfast t1_ixjarf4 wrote

Probably a fuckin whataburger or something. Who knows. Nothing ever manages to stay open in that spot, it’s like blue bull all over again lol

−10

SnooMaps5167 t1_ixjbkpl wrote

Man I walk or drive by these buildings everyday wondering why they’re so sad. Each time I imagined operating a print shop or studio space with those garage doors open and activity.

10

Angus_Cornwall t1_ixjfc5a wrote

Typical for Springfield to tear down old buildings. Wonder where the outrage is for these like National and Sunshine

−10

EyeOk389 t1_ixjfrjh wrote

Wish I had a chance to remove the tin on the upper backside of that building. Some really nice stuff

3

slossages t1_ixjhs84 wrote

They're putting in a Denny's.

−5

ArtemisGrey t1_ixjz6rr wrote

Hmm..

>Pinecone Holdings

>Pinecones are complicated. They've got lots of little pieces, there are hundreds of different types, and they can even get sticky. But if you give them the right circumstances, fertile soil, and some care, they have the potential to become something much greater.

>At Pinecone Holdings, our projects are like pinecones. They may be complicated, they have lots of little pieces, they come in all shapes and sizes, and there's bound to be a sticky situation or two. But with our management team, they too will become something great.

7

Diemon-Dave t1_ixk0il6 wrote

Odds are: Cashew Chicken restaurant.

−1

WorldFoods t1_ixk10wh wrote

I just passed this today and wondered, too!

1

Moccasinos t1_ixk82c9 wrote

If I remember correctly, the building had been condemned as the roof had already partially collapsed. Something new there would really help that portion of Walnut.

13

Wendypeffy t1_ixkxuan wrote

Some older buildings are too old and dated and when you try to renovate they have to meet current building code. The 100 year old existing structures don’t have the ability to be brought to code without gutting the entire thing, which is often not possible because it lacks structural integrity.

5

MonoChaos t1_ixl3qgs wrote

I swear at this point I would not be surprised if someone on the city council or whatever either A) had ties to the car wash industry that makes them richer with every new car wash built or B) has a car wash fetish.

4

MonoChaos t1_ixl470h wrote

Yes, how dare we remove the condemned buildings so that they don't hurt anyone. They should stay in one place for all eternity simply because they were there before, consequences be damned. No marching forward into the future, we need to stay in the past!

You wouldn't happen to be in the Baby Boomer age range, would you?

https://youtu.be/5AvrBFlJeMs

0

Dramatic_Ad_6560 t1_ixlan0j wrote

As others had mentioned, it was condemned and had been so for a while. As of a couple months ago, there wasn't a real plan as to what will replace it being shared but the owner hasn't ever shown interest in selling. I'm surprised he finally got it torn down.

3

helloporator t1_ixlt8vi wrote

If I had to guess it will be turned into another retail space or more overpriced lofts

3

Yomrdbz t1_ixm0xnh wrote

Probably another church🫢

1

whatlaw-wasbroken t1_ixmco18 wrote

That building was beyond structural repair. The demo took place because it was a danger as it stood. The concrete beams, concrete roof and columns were breaking down.

2

VaderTower t1_ixml9ik wrote

Pretty much anything would be better than rodent infested, condemned, falling down building. Even just grass.

But seriously now, is retail a bad thing downtown? If anything I don't think we have enough retail down there actually selling and keeping people walking around. Maybe 10 shops regularly open at most for retail sales?

Second space is at a premium in denser neighborhoods, because of that if you think you can get the same bed/bath and square footage as somewhere not as dense, it's not practical. So yeah lofts downtown are probably +20% for the same apartment size you'd get on Kansas and Sunshine, but the land bought to turn into lofts is likely more than 20% more downtown anyways.

7

VaderTower t1_ixmm8ut wrote

Yeah boutiques seem like the only ones who had been able to sustain the model downtown. But most have left for greener pastures.

I would love to see more options, but I don't know how you create the draw. I'm confident the downtown association has talked this to death but I'm still not sure how we get there.

3

PineconeHoldings t1_ixnmcbi wrote

The buildings were owned by a non-descript cabinet maker with granite countertop capabilities. He never even hung a sign during his decades there. The property was purchased to remodel and augment the west side’s commercial base. Sadly, the buildings had deteriorated beyond all economic repair necessitating its demolition. [Go figure, that concrete could become rotten?!] Certainly this is a distinct financial setback. The silver lining, however, will be that whatever is built back will not be constrained by the prior footprint. [The current Pickleman’s location has a similar story, rising from the ashes. In this case rising from the debris.] Nothing will happen quickly in this economic environment of rising interest rates, crazy construction costs and a looming recession. But ideas can be hatched while waiting for the rebound. Obviously there can be “overpriced” lofts on an upper level. LOL. But that said, what viable ground level downtown business would be a good fit? [Keep in mind it is better to satisfy a “need” than just a want.].

2

itsmeclaytonlee t1_ixrp8up wrote

I heard from the manager of the business next door that it was going to be some sort of parking but no cited info 🤷

1