How are both ‘wrong’? What makes either ‘wrong’? There is nothing wrong with development. There is nothing wrong with what Gidden’s insinuated. He is correct. Does it make Bach and the balking of ‘Springfielders’ to development destructive? Does his statement that Bach and the fight against developing that particular location in Galloway closed Springfield for business seem plausible? Absolutely. To say it is wrong and Bach correct is laughable. That’s impossible.