DanielPhermous t1_j9ofs75 wrote
Reply to comment by 2KoolAwYe in Apple reportedly made a big breakthrough on a secret non-invasive blood glucose monitor project that originally was part of a 'fake' startup by dakiki
> Look up on a CSS comparison sites the specific version of safari you used and what was missing, I only noticed this because I was doing web development and constantly had to make similar """fixes""" for safari, potentially more than IE in some cases
That would only provide half the story. I requested a source that they were boasting it's faster while disabling features.
>It's possible to make an indie film or YouTube videos, their marketing suggested you could make the NEXT CINEMA BLOCKBUSTER
Those goal posts have shunted somewhat. A minute ago, it was just "feature film". Can you link an example of that marketing so we can see which version you've presented is the correct one?
>Pal, you and I both know that paragraph is both a lie and full of cope
Okay. Can you provide an example of a virus in the wild for Mac OS X from it's introduction until when, say, Steve died? That's about the period they were boasting about their lack of viruses.
>They did, what are you talking about?
You claimed people didn't bother writing viruses for the Mac because it wasn't popular enough to bother, but there were more viruses for Mac OS 9 than Mac OS X, even though it had less market share. Can you explain that discrepancy?
>I'll admit I might be wrong on this one, I'm pretty sure I've heard the company discuss the idea before though
Sure. Source?
2KoolAwYe t1_j9og1tx wrote
I'm not going to write you an essay or provide you sources because I get the feeling you're not going to accept them and I have better things to do
Google it or not, you have enough info to easily find all of it, I don't care if you believe me about the reality of these things
DanielPhermous t1_j9oh362 wrote
Bullshit is easy. Proving it is obviously more difficult.
Shrug.
2KoolAwYe t1_j9oi5zp wrote
Proving it would take more effort than it's worth, for someone who is going to clap back with semantics and not understand what I'm saying
The thing that broke me was thinking that there are versions of Mac OS without exploits or malicious software, after you saying that is very clear you're not prepared to listen, so I'm gonna take the downvotes from other pedants that don't want to look things up on here so I can enjoy my day off and not waste time researching on you
DanielPhermous t1_j9oll3s wrote
> The thing that broke me was thinking that there are versions of Mac OS without exploits or malicious software
And now you're lying about what I said, as if I can't remember.
"They did have a small amount of malware, however, but no viruses."
This is how you convince yourself you've won? By lying to yourself about what my arguments were?
That is no victory. That's your ego seeking catharsis.
Inbox replies disabled. There's no point talking to someone who will lie to my face about my own words.
2KoolAwYe t1_j9oo5kv wrote
No, it's the bit about Mac OS 9/10
This is exactly what I'm talking about
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments