Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

DangerousAd1731 t1_jaog9vf wrote

Go to r/spicypillows Reddit. You probably don’t want a lithium battery in your head!

6

wambulancer t1_jap3paj wrote

what, exactly, about the way our society, systems, and economy is set up says "oh hell yea install a computer in my brain this will have no bad outcomes"

41

Due-Resident-4588 t1_japi37e wrote

I don’t trust anyone enough to ever have a chip on my brain. You never know what they could be doing. Your thoughts could be controlled , just so much that could happen I would never trust it.

8

recon89 t1_japoozw wrote

Gotta find a guinea pig somewhere, I mean they already tested real pigs.. now they need to test other pigs. I mean people. Can they implant Elon as a test? Clone him first obviously, they need a backup at least.

15

josefx t1_japxi0s wrote

The good news is that this is neuralink we are talking about. With the amount of monkey brains they went through the most likely outcome is a painful death, not eternal enslavement to twitter.

7

jampapi t1_jaq5871 wrote

I think a backup Elon (or a fleet of them) is exactly why he’s doing this. That old idiom about a man and his wealth (“you can’t take it with you”) may be nearing its expiration date. Imagine Elon-droids still utilizing that fortune 200 years from now, on Mars, in space, fistfighting Bezos-bot, the possibilities are endless

2

RaccoonProcedureCall t1_jaqiwnb wrote

It’s also scary to think of a world in which this technology becomes necessary to be competitive. I hate to imagine what would happen if no company was willing to hire someone who can’t interact with a computer as quickly as they can think, yet some people still refused to use the technology for various reasons.

5

RaccoonProcedureCall t1_jaqjl6r wrote

Yeah, I get the excitement there is for this tech, but it seems to me that even the slightest scrutiny reveals grave risks at practically every level from immediate health hazards to potential societal problems. I think there are some non-technological challenges that really ought to be addressed before we consider incorporating this kind of technology into our lives.

3

ImaginaryEffort4409 t1_jaqk4rr wrote

Meanwhile it's 2023 and my brand new $600 phone can't even reliably recognize my fingerprint lol

5

DneSokas t1_jaqn2n8 wrote

You wouldn't neccesarily have to take that kind of risk with a brain interface, its pretty easy to make a circuit that can output only so you control the computer with your thoughts but there's no return line so it still has to show the information back to you on a screen. A screen on you're eyeball if you want to be all fancy and integrated about it but a screen with no direct input to your brain beyond the usual visual means.

This is probably actually the prefered way to set up such a system because the actual implanted parts are pretty much just your peripherals meaning you can have the actual device be external which saves you a lot of unnecesary surgery every time computers get better.

Of course musk is the same guy who's proposing indentured servitude on mars so he's probably going down the mind control route if he can.

2

Tony_TNT t1_jaquvb8 wrote

I have multiple scars and had a few broken bones. Body almost always can heal to some extent, but never fully and there's always some marks, inconveniences and imperfections. Can't imagine willingly wanting someone to rummage around in your head to implant some new half-assed tech into it and hope it almost works at best and doesn't make you a vegetable at worst.

2

ACCount82 t1_jaqz6jy wrote

Lots of things. Human brain is painfully limited and borderline inadequate for the requirements the modern world puts on it.

Of course, the current state of the art is nowhere near being able to improve on that. But that's now. BCI tech is really promising still - too many human limitations lie in the brain, and we can't do anything about them without cracking the skull open.

2

ACCount82 t1_jaqzddd wrote

First Neuralink devices are expected to work like that. The device only scans the brain for inputs, and uses those inputs to drive peripherals like virtual mouse or keyboard. No neural feedback involved.

We don't really know what the limits of the no-feedback approach are. It could be that you would be able to achieve superhuman typing speeds on those first gen systems, with lots of practice - or that a more in-depth approach would be required for that.

2

it_administrator01 t1_jarebvw wrote

My time is divided up between the UK and the US

My point is that I don't just walk around as an average citizen in fear of law enforcement randomly targeting me and my phone - frankly that's a strange way of living and an even stranger justification of removing one of the biggest QoL improvements that smartphones have had in the past 15 years.

If I was a drug dealer or terrorist, sure - passcode only, but living out of fear that police are randomly going to target me out of the blue, and then scour the 55000 photos/1m+ messages on my phone until they find something incriminating is a comical level of paranoia and epitomises the attitude of the average redditor with limited real world experience. There are faster ways for police to fill their quotas.

3

ACCount82 t1_jasobh1 wrote

/u/SidewaysFancyPrance: still have your comment cached, so here's a reply

This kind of feedback loop has been going for a while now. Humans shaping their environment, and adapting to the environment they themselves shaped. It's a process so old it pops up in the fossil record. It's just stuck on a bottleneck now. Humans got too good at shaping their environment, and evolution no longer cuts it when it comes to shaping humans to match it in turn.

Which means: it's time to take over that part of the process too.

>If we feel like we have to install hardware in our brains to survive, we've failed as a species.

Or: that humans have truly succeeded as a species.

Humans have a history of breaking natural limits. Humankind used to be foragers - until humans got very sick of their food supply being at a whim of their environment and invented agriculture, enabling them to specialize and accomplish more. Humans used to rely on spoken word to teach and spread knowledge - until they invented writing, allowing human knowledge to endure, to resist corruption, to be stored, transferred and replicated much more effectively. Humans used to get culled by horrendous pandemics - until they got tired of dying pointless deaths and started figuring out things like germs, vaccines and disease prevention. Humans used to struggle to understand their world, inventing things like superstitions in a desperate attempt to explain what they could not understand - until they invented scientific method, allowing their imperfect minds to be used to discern the truths of the world.

The thing is, it's not about survival. Humans haven't been a threatened species since the last Ice Age. It's about how humans want to live.

Imagine having intuitive understanding of personal finances. Or an ability to remember and recall strong enough that "where I left that thing?" or "did I forget to turn something off?" never happens in your life anymore. Or just being flat out smarter - better at remembering, understanding, recalling, making the right connections and applying knowledge. Imagine being able to get by on a single hour of sleep a day - and feeling more rested than you do after a full night of sleep now. Imagine being able to pry a drug addiction straight out of your mind just by wanting to do so.

Those things are impossible now. They don't have to remain that way.

0

EngineFrosty t1_jaul957 wrote

This man is a con-artist. He is way out of his depth on this. Dealing with the FDA is a whole different animal than fucking electric cars.

1

PunchCakee t1_jawp92e wrote

I dont know why you say that? Nearly every single product that has hit the market has been reverse engineered by a lot of people including the most elite hardware developers and embedded systems engineers.

The possibility of something like a remote code execution happening is so so slim.

1

WimbleWimble t1_jawu8do wrote

The Link OP has provided relates to a denial at the end of 2021 / beginning of 2022 and bears zero relation to the current 2023 application/tech

1