EmbarrassedHelp t1_je2tjg0 wrote on March 29, 2023 at 12:17 AM

Reply to comment by aflarge in The guy behind the viral fake photo of the Pope in a puffy coat says using AI to make images of celebrities 'might be the line' — and calls for greater regulation by Lakerlion

You joke, but I could see governments trying to pressure Adobe into adding AI to Photoshop that constantly scan what you are making in order to try and block things they don't like.

ozonejl t1_je3ay6c wrote on March 29, 2023 at 2:29 AM

I’m in the Adobe Firefly beta and the content filters are pretty restrictive. Deleted what I thought were a couple innocuous words from my prompts AND I wouldn’t let me use “Michael Jackson.” To be fair, I was trying to make Michael Jackson at the karaoke bar with G.G. Allin, who apparently Adobe doesn’t know about.

[deleted] t1_je5eol1 wrote on March 29, 2023 at 3:20 PM

[removed]

MetricVeil t1_je2w6cs wrote on March 29, 2023 at 12:36 AM

Yep, they did something similar with photocopiers and paper currency, I believe.

[deleted] t1_je5epcc wrote on March 29, 2023 at 3:20 PM

[removed]

WhatTheZuck420 t1_je3bhwp wrote on March 29, 2023 at 2:34 AM

adobe: no problemo. we already scan in order to sell shit.

aflarge t1_je2v8pl wrote on March 29, 2023 at 12:29 AM

Seems like a sure fire way to make sure Photoshop ceases to be an industry standard.

H3g3m0n t1_je4c5i7 wrote on March 29, 2023 at 9:40 AM

There are copyrighted colors that Photoshop refuses to display without a $15 permonth subscription. Thanks Pantone.

Also Photoshop refuses to work on images of American currency.

aflarge t1_jed549p wrote on March 31, 2023 at 3:33 AM

That's idiotic. That's like taking people to court because their picture of the night sky included the star you "own".