Submitted by vriska1 t3_126vqm8 in technology
MargretTatchersParty t1_jebavgz wrote
These are the senators that are sponsoring and cosponsoring the bill:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/686/cosponsors
​
Contact your representatives now: https://www.congress.gov/members/find-your-member
[deleted] t1_jebyqx2 wrote
[deleted]
Ominusone t1_jecnr0i wrote
I'm just shocked Fox News is covering it and making it look like a bad idea instead of praising it.
jayRIOT t1_jed0yqo wrote
No worries, they've already moved on to telling their audience about the leftist, socialist, politically motivated conspiracy that got Trump indicted today.
frickin_moron t1_jeezph1 wrote
You do realize a democrat created this bill?
MargretTatchersParty t1_jec0x9d wrote
His name is signed to it. Doesn't matter. If you're a constituent to him. Email and let him know you're disappointed in is actions.
Jedi_Outcast t1_jed0vm3 wrote
And that guy keeps getting elected too.
Zelstrom t1_jee5uly wrote
Half the country thinks religious "freedom" laws that allow bigots to bully anything they don't like are a good idea. Of course he keeps getting re-elected.
ShawnyMcKnight t1_jebelan wrote
Don't have my state.... don't have my state.... don't have my state
looks.....
Fucking Deb Fischer....
MargretTatchersParty t1_jebfu5b wrote
Make it known that she will be unwelcome in your state and not voted for again. Even if this doesn't pass.. they'll try to pass a similar bill later.
​
I have "I vote for America" but when it comes to rights it's "I blew off my legs so I can break your encryption" Duckworth.
ShawnyMcKnight t1_jebg2s5 wrote
But she is welcome, she is very welcome. Outside of the two big cities in NE she pretty much gets all the votes.
MargretTatchersParty t1_jebkeoc wrote
The only way to get your point across to these people is to get the people who they rely on for support to understand how bad it would be for them. Communicate that the effects of the Liconianians will have on their lives and the threats created under this bil to them.
[deleted] t1_jecwial wrote
[deleted]
eveningsand t1_jecmvjs wrote
Yeah I get the feeling it's less about keeping us safe and more about keeping them secure.
MargretTatchersParty t1_jectkrq wrote
Yep. Have you contacted your senators yet?
Patient_Commentary t1_jecpdu9 wrote
CA.. not on the list. Phew.
Ulpian02 t1_jee0gls wrote
Reasons I am so glad I didn’t wind up having to intern with a particular congressman from my state 101
[deleted] t1_jecwdoa wrote
[deleted]
FrostyDog94 t1_jec6m8c wrote
Damnit Hickenlooper...
MargretTatchersParty t1_jec8z7p wrote
>Hickenlooper
Have you contacted him?
[deleted] t1_jeedyfh wrote
[removed]
Shartshooter01 t1_jede4f8 wrote
Here's a template you can use if you can't be bothered to write your own.
Subject: Urgent: Please Oppose the Restrict Act - Protect Our Freedoms
Dear [Representative's Name],
I hope this email finds you in good health and high spirits. My name is [Your Name], and I am a concerned citizen residing in [Your City/Town], [Your State]. I am writing to you today to express my deep concern regarding the Restrict Act, which is currently under consideration. I implore you not to support this legislation and to actively oppose it to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of our citizens.
The Restrict Act, as it stands, presents a number of troubling implications for our society:
Infringement on Privacy: The Act would grant extensive surveillance powers to government agencies, eroding the privacy rights of millions of Americans. This sets a dangerous precedent, as it further encroaches upon our Fourth Amendment rights.
Suppression of Free Speech: The broad scope of the legislation may lead to the suppression of free speech and expression, both online and offline. The Act's vague language could be interpreted in ways that stifle dissenting opinions and penalize lawful protest, undermining our First Amendment rights.
Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Communities: The Restrict Act is likely to disproportionately affect marginalized communities, who have historically been subjected to greater scrutiny and surveillance. This would further perpetuate social inequity and injustice in our society.
Misallocation of Resources: The resources allocated to enforce the Restrict Act could be better spent addressing pressing issues in our state, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. These areas are in dire need of attention and funding, and would benefit our citizens far more than the implementation of a repressive law.
I strongly urge you to take these concerns into account and to stand up for the rights and freedoms of your constituents by opposing the Restrict Act. As an elected representative, your primary duty is to protect and uphold the best interests of the people you serve. By opposing this legislation, you would be demonstrating a commitment to preserving the democratic values that make our nation great.
Sincerely,
[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [City, State, ZIP Code] [Your Email Address] [Your Phone Number]
Disclaimer: text generated by ChatGPT.
B-Glasses t1_jedmrtq wrote
Of course Susan Colins is there
Maniacal_Artist t1_jecv3bd wrote
Thank Christ, for once my state isn't attached to one of these shitty bills
MargretTatchersParty t1_jedb22w wrote
Yet. Contact your senators to prevent that.
[deleted] t1_jedksx3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jege4iz wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments