ctimmermans t1_itfrtqe wrote
Reply to comment by MrMarklar in Meta threatens to block news content in Canada over media revenue-sharing legislation by BollocksAsBalls
Yes, but they can easily switch providers or get the water elsewhere and transport it to the office. Apparently with Facebook that’s not an option
MrMarklar t1_itfsj5k wrote
They want to spread their independent journalistic work through a platform that reaches the most people. It doesn't make it any less independent.
Let's say facebook said you can't write about X or you always have to meantion Y in your articles in order to be allowed on their platform. If they complied, then they would cease to be independent. But that's not the case here, facebook is just a means to reach an audience for their independent news outlet without any sort of influence being enforced by Meta on their work.
It's not a hard concept to grasp.
ctimmermans t1_itfspml wrote
I understand the concept. I’m just saying it has consequences (especially longer term) which are not in their favor.
Like being dependent on Facebook.
yut7 t1_itfyksj wrote
Facebook no way stops them from disseminating their context outside of facebook.
They are free to open TV channel, YouTube channel, start their newspaper, start magazine, build own website and thousand other things.
Facebook is a successful platform, one of most successful ones in entire human history.
knockingatthegate t1_itj0kv8 wrote
For “successful” read “exploitative” and “counterproductive to the aims of a healthy and sustainable civil society.”
anti-torque t1_itgg5yb wrote
It's not a hard concept.
But when the execution lines you up next to an ad for pizzagate, what was that concept, again?
MrMarklar t1_itgisiq wrote
Sorry, but I don't get your point (no offense). I think you're saying good articles and shitty articles exist side by side on the same platform, but I don't know what you are implying with this. It doesn't make the aforementioned independant news sites any more corrupt or less valuable (make them even more so)
anti-torque t1_itgk1rk wrote
The platform they choose delegitimizes their own content, due to association.
I know I would likely never go to a fb link for news. I have issues going to small businesses who can't figure out how to make a wordpress page, leaving it up to fb and yelp to tell me who they are.
MrMarklar t1_itglkxr wrote
I don't think OP means they have their whole business on Facebook. It's just a means to share their articles. All serious businesses that depend on online engagement have pages on Facebook and other social media that point to their websites, it's just a nobrainer.
While I don't browse facebook at all, lots of people still do.
What's the "proper" way to grow your business online, astrosurfing on reddit?
anti-torque t1_itgml4w wrote
lol... it's valid to direct traffic away from fb, I guess.
There are a lot of local businesses who do only have these fb profiles as their business page. It's pretty annoying going from an interwebs experience where I'm just cruising along, to this fb page that tells me nothing, except what a neat pumpikin carving some kids did today... at this restaurant that has no known menu online.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments