StrangeCharmVote t1_iy7chwy wrote
Reply to comment by cleeder in Robots will roam a university to study “a socio-technical problem” — will wander a Texas campus so researchers can study human-robot relations. by marketrent
No, it doesn't.
People should already know vandalism carries consequences.
HolyAndOblivious t1_iy7qw06 wrote
Yest it does. You want to know how much wi they get vandalized when unsupervised
StrangeCharmVote t1_iya7wr5 wrote
And the answer is already exactly the same amount everything else does unsupervised.
People already know there are consequences if caught.
Why would you possibly think a study would be dismissed, when the devices themselves are already covered in cameras?
Seriously, think about what you're saying.
HolyAndOblivious t1_iyawnb2 wrote
No. You really want to measure. The difference between science and screwing around is measuring this appropriately and having a log.
For it to be valid knowledge ot needs to be tested
StrangeCharmVote t1_iybaw2u wrote
> No. You really want to measure. The difference between science and screwing around is measuring this appropriately and having a log.
You seem to misunderstand something.
I'm in favor of the study.
The dingus i was replying to, thought having robots which were observed, would invalidate the study on robots... which pretty universally are already under some kind of observation.
I thought that opinion, was dumb.
> For it to be valid knowledge ot needs to be tested
And how are you going to validate anything when you're literally excluding the possibility of tangible results if an event occurs?
FlametopFred t1_iy7cz9v wrote
hopefully for all the Jan 6 participants and organizers 🌝👍
StrangeCharmVote t1_iya81u5 wrote
> hopefully for all the Jan 6 participants and organizers 🌝👍
No shit. What does that have to do with this though?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments