Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

deftonite t1_ix414nx wrote

You're confused by quantity vs quality. The doc you're using for the basis of your arguement says that Chinese submitted more papers. It doesn't speak to the quality or impact of those papers. Any group can manufacture useless papers to have the appearance of superiority. Just as any redditor can shitpost useless claims repeatedly in an attempt to change perception. Just look at your posts here for verification.

1

telmimore t1_ix4isbe wrote

The conference only selects the best papers. Hence, quality. The fact that you can't comprehend this simple logic and are still going on about "quality over quantity hurrr durr" is astonishing frankly.

The nature index only looks at high quality papers as well. Again, if you read the link you'd have known this and wouldn't have gone on to your irrelevant rhetoric.

What's amazing is at least 3 other simpletons chose to vote you up and give you awards for straight up incorrect bullshit.

1