Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Brocklesocks t1_j1xnc06 wrote

Please post more links about AI. I'm not tired of hearing about it at all

22

Brocklesocks t1_j1y629a wrote

It won't. The government would step in if it actually threatens the economy in a significant enough way. People are just fear mongering over the uncertainty.

It would be bad for companies if it automated people out of jobs, because they need customers. So they will need to find ways to create value using AI.

There's no point in trying to advance humanity if we don't create new technology that can work for us.

−16

leroy_hoffenfeffer t1_j1zs373 wrote

>“The things that agencies should be doing is beyond experimenting with this; they should be calculating now what it means for their business,” Curtis said. “It is a tool humans will use to kickstart creative thinking or to create the base level of something, which they then adapt continuously, or to move more quickly. … It is not an answer to everything, but it does radically shift the economics of a lot of what we do in creativity.”

Translated: "Were going to replace our creative workers with AI tools"

> Zach Kula, group strategy director at BBDO, said the industry should be thinking about this tool less in terms of how it could replace humans and more about the various ways it could revolutionize how creatives do their jobs.

Lol, this guy is either hopelessly naive, or just has no actual idea what businesses are going to do with these tools. Business owners don't really care about how creatives do their job: the end result is all that matters. If owners think they can save money and just use these tools instead of using creative experts, they'll absolutely just give using the tools a try. Worst comes to worst, you can just hire someone else if solely using the tools doesn't pan out.

> “In my mind, it doesn’t appear that many of the people commenting on this have even used the tool,” Kula said. “If they did, it would be obvious it’s not even close to replacing creative thinking. In fact, I’d say it exposes how valuable true creative thinking actually is. It puts the difference between original creative thought and eloquently constructed database information in plain sight.”

I mean again, business owners don't really care about "true creative thought" for the most part. Nowadays, it's all about catchy headlines, clicks and who publishes first.

This article downplays or ignores the actual concerns people have, makes businesses seem more practically ethical than they actually will be, and undersells how disruptive the tech will be once fully matured.

5

BrokenMemento t1_j21o4kc wrote

I’m a bit concerned about 2D/3D art images in regards to ownership. I don’t think you can claim ownership of ai art without transformative work on it and the problem is proving that will be nearly impossible without the video process documented… this will also affect non ai artists because people will claim that their work is done using mid journey/stablediff.

We’re probably going to see a big change in copyright and ownership laws. This new tech will pave a way for more NFT scammers and IP thieves. Big companies won’t be affected but the average joe won’t be able to fight this

1