Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

KSRandom195 t1_j1s6e7z wrote

Reply to comment by _mh05 in AI Is Now Essential National Infrastructure by jormungandrsjig

There were specific callouts I did not see, such as it being a protected IP or having export restrictions, like RSA encryption.

7

_mh05 t1_j1seaar wrote

Thanks! When learning about the artist communities against AI (i.e. ArtStation), I came across how AI cannot copyright artwork from a comic book created using it. So guessing how that applies to other works, like patents and so others. Now have to look into more about what you just mentioned regarding exporting and encryption.

1

quantumfucker t1_j1sjnku wrote

That’s not accurate, regarding the comic book. That decision isn’t finalized, it is only halted so that the artist can explain their creative process and why it deserves protection. There is concern that it’s not human-driven enough to be considered a creative product, though I would disagree.

7

_mh05 t1_j1sk74s wrote

Good job for pointing out. Will make sure to follow the issue revolving the comic

3

fitzroy95 t1_j1sphbo wrote

Please note that different nations have made different rulings on copyright as applied to AI.

In the US & Europe, for example, AI generated works are not copyrightable.

Other nations, however, allow it but assign the copyright to the AI's programmer.

However, all of this has been undergoing significant review over the last few years as AI have become more capable and more accessible.

1

AadamAtomic t1_j1u2ghj wrote

>In the US & Europe, for example, AI generated works are not copyrightable.

there is no copyright protection for works generated solely by a machine.

However, copyright is possible in cases where the creator can prove there was substantial human input.

I.e: Wright a poem and Run it through A.I.

3