Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SirRockalotTDS t1_j1zyte0 wrote

Poor darling. Webster's 2nd definition is "original or striking in concept or style" doesn't use the word new! Semantic crisis that never happend is over! Now you should be able to get past the title and read the article now.

−5

yeehah t1_j206hti wrote

Update: I took your sage advice and read the article, only to find that the rest of it is also poorly written. It's mostly technobabble that reads like a sales brochure for potential investors.

3

SirRockalotTDS t1_j25llch wrote

Welcome to reddit. The forum where well written technical articles are as common as pots of gold under rainbows, titles are made up, and the points don't matter.

2

PrandialSpork t1_j20vrhh wrote

Now you should be able to get past the title and read the article now.

I can see why the tautology isn't a problem for you

2