Submitted by alapatrie t3_zvnlip in technology
Comments
Wh00ster t1_j1q3cie wrote
I’m going to guess they took a really bare bones shitty metric and extrapolated it as a “shittiness” metric
Edit: upon quick glance, looks like they’re using their net worth/company worth as a metric for quality of leadership. So yep.
zoggmygoggue t1_j1qgjgx wrote
Who are the lousiest copy editor?
fishyfishyfish1 t1_j1r1jsd wrote
Elon has this one in the bag
banksypublicalterego t1_j1s8hl2 wrote
I don’t think The Guardian has been using those for years.
Aggravating-Hair7931 t1_j1sb511 wrote
Bored Panda takes the crown. They always stole content from Reddit.
GoldWallpaper t1_j1sohmn wrote
When you beat out Zuck by a little bit, it's time to reevaluate. When you utterly destroy him in a worst-boss competition, it's time to just fucking give up.
eejjkk t1_j1sqaob wrote
Great job on the title there OP. You fucking killed it. Gold Star ⭐️
HenryKringle6000 t1_j1srkm8 wrote
#1. Elon Musk. #2. Elon Musk. #3. Elon Musk …
_mh05 t1_j1tk6o4 wrote
Musk only need one or two months of 2022 to make top cut. Wait and see what 2023 has in store
nntb t1_j1tsa46 wrote
The year isn't over yet. There is still time for me to launch my company
cropguru357 t1_j1u7qrw wrote
Elizabeth Holmes deserves a mention.
Fuzakenaideyo t1_j1uirwp wrote
Elon is numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5!
[deleted] t1_j1q1y67 wrote
[removed]