Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

GreatFairyDavi t1_j1dgzat wrote

4

CatProgrammer t1_j1dhdne wrote

It's not a definite thing, but it matches his previous pattern of activity, especially when you factor in how he offered so much more than the actual estimated value of Twitter. He even tried to back out by claiming there were more bots than he was told but wasn't successful because the contract he signed didn't allow that as an option, I believe.

9

GreatFairyDavi t1_j1dhh5w wrote

Oh that’s

Glorious

That’s beautiful

That’s what you get for trying to manipulate stocks and pretend your a good freedom fighter

3

naginagina t1_j1dw0f1 wrote

I know nothing about the law, but wasn't it because he waived due diligence or something?

2

CatProgrammer t1_j1dyv8x wrote

Going by r/EnoughMuskSpam/comments/w19d6j/twitters_filing_in_delaware_court_shows_musk_was/ you do due diligence before signing any contracts to begin with.

2