Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Deathbeddit t1_j6bovf7 wrote

“Flow batteries can, in theory, be easily scaled up to ­megawatt-hours by increasing the size of the tanks. They can also have longer lifetimes and be safer than lithium ion. They remain costly, though, with a capital cost of around US $800 per kilowatt-hour, more than twice that of lithium-ion batteries. “But they can be much cheaper, and our work accelerates this process,” says Nian Liu, a chemical and biomolecular engineering professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology.”

Improvements in the design efficiency could reduce that price and footprint by half initially and further as additional research progresses.

Another important element is that the electrolytes could be made easier to recycle which would bring down cost.

9

Deathbeddit t1_j6c1b5i wrote

Title: Holds promise

Sub: technology

Lots of things don’t pan out but I am happy they’re being pursued because progress is important. It’s not like they said “climate crisis solved.”

4

GhostofDownvotes t1_j6c5dp6 wrote

Yeah, okay, science-bro, wake me up once your thing-of-the-week hits the market.

0

Deathbeddit t1_j6cgtm4 wrote

The paper referenced in the article used zinc iodide, but specifically stated it would be compatible with zinc bromide and other electrolyte chemistries.

I think that suggests that if scalable and practical, the improvements potentially highlighted in this article could be applied to the flow through segment of the company you mentioned.

(Note, I’m not a chemist, so please correct me if I misunderstood anything- the article was linked in OP’s story, and I compared to the website you provided).

1

billdietrich1 t1_j6cn8h5 wrote

Oh, if you're objecting to that part, that's solely because you truncated their sentence:

> Unlike lithium-ion batteries, which store energy in solid electrodes, flow batteries store chemical energy in liquid electrolytes that sit in tanks.

5