Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

riffruff2 t1_j39d49i wrote

Dude the entire argument was that if you're using a HDMI device then you will have quality loss with this wireless solution opposed to using a standard non-wireless tv. You're pulling a classic strawman argument. Taking HDMI out of the equation is not an argument. I can't connect my Roku, computer, Xbox, PlayStation, or whatever other device I have to this tv without quality loss.

1

sybesis t1_j39givz wrote

You're basing your argument on assumptions. Here's a review made by Linus Tech Tips made 1 year ago about a wireless HDMI drop in replacement. Note here that's a replacement for HDMI not simply ditching it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kojTyPdhp3s&ab_channel=LinusTechTips

> I can't connect my Roku, computer, Xbox, PlayStation, or whatever other device I have to this tv without quality loss.

Based on what evidence? Do you sincerely believe LG would release a device with a technology that makes video look shitty on their TVs?

1

riffruff2 t1_j39k0m9 wrote

I mean that device severely limits the quality. The evidence is in your video. It doesn't even support HDR for example. Is that fine for you?

Yes I believe LG would release it. It's to be the first. I work very closely with both LG and Samsung with their hospitality displays. I have weekly meetings with their display engineers. My evidence is from experience.

1