stumpcity t1_iwsj08q wrote on November 18, 2022 at 12:45 AM

Reply to comment by TheSmJ in Roku to Lay Off 200 Employees, Cutting Headcount by 7% by MarvelsGrantMan136

>They were losing platform domination because their platform (the set top box) was no longer necessary

They had already moved into providing a lot of the software for Smart TV's alongside providing standalone boxes by that time. You seem unsure as to how Roku actually works inside a smart tv, too.

They had other options beside "content," people - without really understanding what they're talking about - wanna keep acting like they were helpless to make this dumb call that they made.

TheSmJ t1_iwskzrf wrote on November 18, 2022 at 1:00 AM

Oh then by all means please explain what those other options are, in the most condescending way you can muster for those of us who don't understand them nearly as well as you do.

stumpcity t1_iwsl7mx wrote on November 18, 2022 at 1:02 AM

Dude, it's not my fault you ran into a convo trying to cape for faceless execs with no real knowledge of anything you were talking about.

Like, it hasn't occurred to you that knee-jerk assuming the execs in question (whoever they are, LOL) had to make the dumb moves they made is a bad assumption to make. But it's almost always the assumption always made, for no other reason than they're rich execs and we're not.

TheSmJ t1_iwsmvo6 wrote on November 18, 2022 at 1:16 AM

No, seriously, what are their other options? If not content creation, or the dying set top box market?

I don't give a shit about the execs. Let's hear some of your ideas.

stumpcity t1_iwsndrw wrote on November 18, 2022 at 1:20 AM

>No, seriously, what are their other options

not letting their software/hardware suck in comparison to competitors in that space.

Which they did.

They chose to spend time, money, and resources chasing content creation instead of shoring up the product that got them known in the first place. They didn't have to go that way, but they did. Again, they're not helpless to pursue bad biz decisions. They chose to do so.

TheSmJ t1_iwso3kr wrote on November 18, 2022 at 1:25 AM

>not letting their software/hardware suck in comparison to competitors in that space. > >Which they did.

Because the market is on its last breath. There's no future there.

stumpcity t1_iwspqoj wrote on November 18, 2022 at 1:39 AM

>Because the market is on its last breath

That's not why they did it

Nor is the streaming software/hardware market "on it's last breath." especially considering the fact streaming is about to be the primary means of consuming television.

TheSmJ t1_iwsszew wrote on November 18, 2022 at 2:04 AM

Streaming isn't on its last breath. The market for stand-alone "streaming boxes" is. The vast majority of people use their TV for that now.

That just leaves the Roku app, and there needs to be a reason to launch the app for it to be of any value.

You want to take a stab at what that reason is?

stumpcity t1_iwsvr9m wrote on November 18, 2022 at 2:26 AM

>The market for stand-alone "streaming boxes" is.

I've already addressed why it's not simply "stand-alone" streaming boxes, and why it also includes the streaming software included in many of the Smart TVs being sold, their software ALSO becoming subpar in the time they spent to pursue content creation alongside their hardware becoming undesirable.

(also the market for standalone boxes/pucks/sticks isn't "on its last breath" either)

You keep suggesting that Roku on Smart TVs works by "launching the app" when that's not how that works, too. You don't "launch the app" on a smart TV powered by Roku. You just turn the TV on. Roku is the software that makes the TV go. You seem to believe it's an app - it's the OS.