Submitted by fictionfreesfools t3_zzbl5h in television

In "The Offer" (2022), Michael Tolkin is listed in the opening credits under "Executive Producer", "Developed by", "Created by", and lastly "Teleplay/Written by". In all but "Teleplay/Written by" is he listed once. The wording under "Teleplay by" is as follows:

> Teleplay by

> Michael Tolkin & Leslie Greif

> and

> Michael Tolkin & Nikki Toscano & Kevin J. Hynes

Why the double listing for this specific role?

6

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Maninhartsford t1_j2aona9 wrote

American writer credits typically use an & when writers are working together as a team. "And" means the writer or writers listed after rewrote an existing draft. So in this case, Michael Tolkin and Leslie Grief wrote a draft, then Tolkin, Toscano and Hynes significantly rewrote it

28

fictionfreesfools OP t1_j2axibb wrote

Okay so every rewrite gets an "and", followed by the writers involved, appended to the "Written by" credit?

In this case there were 2 rewrites for every episode and every rewrite included Tolkin?

6

monsieurxander t1_j2aprrj wrote

From Writers Guild of America:

>The word “and” designates that the writers wrote separately and an ampersand (“&”) denotes a writing team.

In this case, it looks like two writing teams worked on the episode, and Michael Tolkin was a member of both teams.

20

fictionfreesfools OP t1_j2ayc4h wrote

Big thanks for citing your insight.

It's odd to think that there are two writing teams with the principal writer being on both teams. Do they both write their own version of the episode and then the 2 version of synthesized to create the refined finished episode script?

3

monsieurxander t1_j2b96d7 wrote

I think it's more likely that it was written by one team, and then rewritten by the other.

WGA rules state that if the final draft keeps more than 33% of the original, the original writer (or writing team) gets a teleplay credit.

If it's less than that, and it kept a "basic narrative, idea, theme or outline," they get a story credit.

6

orobouros t1_j2exdwe wrote

This is one of those odd regulatory things where it doesn't make sense unless you know some of the history. At some point, there was some dispute about how much contribution entitles one to be in the credits. So to avoid that problem in the future, they do it this way. This also makes a bit of sense when for screen entertainment, the plot, development, and such are done by one team, and the actual writing (dialog, actions, etc) are done by another team. The people who are highly creative aren't always the ones that understand how to make a movie, and vice versa.

2

Grundguetiger t1_j2ame4c wrote

Everybody who is involved in film making has it in his contract how and where exactly she or he is listed in the opening and the end credits with the exact words. Here it seems that parts of the script were written by Michael Tolkin & Leslie Greif and other parts by Michael Tolkin & Nikki Toscano & Kevin J. Hynes. So the persons of the one part are named and the persons of the other part too.

5

eleven_eighteen t1_j2bfezi wrote

Writing credits aren't going to be determined by contract the majority of the time, that's for actors and maybe producers and some other crew. At least for Hollywood productions like the show being talked about.

Writing and directing credits follow guidelines from their respective guilds and they can be very specific. And at times very contentious.

In summary: the credits OP is talking about are almost certainly the way they are due to union rules. Going by those rules it seems there were two distinct teams that worked on the scripts and Michael Tolkin was a part of both. The team listed first is in that spot because it is felt that more of their work appears in the final product than the other group. Or because it is felt both groups made equal contributions to the final product and then the credits simply go in chronological order. If there are disputes about this stuff it is handled by arbitration.

4

fictionfreesfools OP t1_j2ax6h6 wrote

That's interesting that the middle "and" denotes a partition of the episode's script. I wonder what constitutes a part of the script? Number of lines, screen time, scenes, etc could all be part demarcators.

1

listyraesder t1_j2bzwtp wrote

It must be at least 25% of the written material that makes the final cut.

1

reddit455 t1_j2aq9z2 wrote

​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleplay

​

Accordingly, story and teleplay will appear as distinct credits on a television script if different people played those roles in the script's creation; if the same person or people performed both roles equally (unless they also worked on the concept with one or more people not directly involved in writing the script or developing the story concept), then the story and teleplay credits will not be used and instead a merged "written by" credit will be given.[2] However, a "written by" credit may be given to only three people maximum; if more than three people were involved, then the credits must distinguish those who were "story" contributors from those who were "teleplay" contributors.[2]

3

fictionfreesfools OP t1_j2az5hq wrote

Wow. I didn't realize how formalized the writing/story credits were. Thank you.

It separation between "story" and "writing" credits is something I'll look further into.

3

AutoModerator t1_j2alkvy wrote

The 2022 Edition of the r/television Favorite Shows Survey is now open!

You may vote by clicking here.

If you have any questions or concerns, please comment here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

metal_stars t1_j2bg8vr wrote

Was it a double episode?

1

fictionfreesfools OP t1_j2bltbm wrote

Every episode with a writer's credit is like this. The only variation being that "Michael Tolkin" isn't always the first name after the "and".

The 1st episode:

> Written by

>Michael Tolkin

The 2nd episode:

> Teleplay by

> Michael Tolkin & Leslie Greif

>and

>Michael Tolkin & Nikki Toscano

The 3rd episode:

  • No writing credits in opening credits.

The 4th episode:

> Teleplay by

> Michael Tolkin & Leslie Greif

>and

>Michael Tolkin & Nikki Toscano

5th episode:

>Teleplay by

>Michael Tolkin

6th episode:

  • No writing credits in opening credits.

7th episode:

  • No writing credits in opening credits.

8th episode:

  • No writing credits in opening credits.

9th episode:

  • No writing credits in opening credits.

10th episode:

> Written by

>Nikki Toscano & Russell Rothberg & Michael Tolkin

1

metal_stars t1_j2boiun wrote

it looks like what's going on is these are double episodes. So it will kind of have two sets of credits at the beginning, only if/where the credits differ between the two episodes. So, for example, the won't list the actors twice, because it's the same actors appearing in both episodes. But if the second episode being paired with the first has a different writing credit, or a different directing credit, from the second episode, then there will be two sets of credits there.

So, when you start up the show, and it shows double-credits for a few things -- that episode is two hours, right? (Or an hour and forty-five minutes, or whatever.)

Back when miniseries were a thing credits like this used to be commonplace.

That was a long time ago though.

Or -- to be more clear -- if there are episodes with two sets of writing credits, followed by an episode with no writing credits, it would be because the episodes originally aired in pairs. And that might not make sense now if you're watching it later, on streaming...

2

fictionfreesfools OP t1_j2bpzno wrote

Respectfully and after numerously repeated searches and pauses, I did not make a transcription mistake.

No episode is less than 50 minutes or greater than 55 minutes.

> Back when miniseries were a thing...

Limited series are still around. In my opinion, limited series will produce higher quality quantity due to a number of factors. Not least of these are the average viewers diminishing attention span and strictly parameterized expected investment to a series up front.

Much smarter people have probably hypothesized more succinctly and with substantiated sources the same sort of idea.

1

32K-REZ t1_j2cpgvy wrote

at least two of their personalities are writers

1