Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AllYouNeedIsATV t1_j9iufy8 wrote

Craving something you had no way of giving us implying that because your partner is missing a body part you may like, you will always be craving it? So if you’re bi and with a woman, you’ll saying they’ll always be craving a dick and if you’re with a man, they’ll always be craving a vagina? Is that not implying the bi person is always looking to cheat?

−1

HugeBrainsOnly t1_j9jzwrg wrote

You inferring something does not mean that thing was implied.

2

Leviathan41911 t1_j9ixfgp wrote

No it's not. It's also not at all what I said. I said him and you changed him to all bi people.

I never said all bi people, I said it was him it was his issue. Never once did I say it was a trait that all bi people have.

1

Majorlagger t1_j9j4a02 wrote

No. Thats not what they said at all, you can choose to infer meaning, or actually read what they wrote. Which was that it is NO excuse for cheating. Their entire post was obviously centered around OP not feeling inadequate or lacking. It was clear it was put in as a possible reason for this man cheating, reasons are not excuses. And the man is still absolutely at fault. It was important to say this because many people in OPs shoes would feel like they where part of the problem or feel insecure.

1