2KoolAwYe t1_ja0z9tm wrote
Reply to comment by underthingy in TIL there's a rock formation in Saudi Arabia about 6 meters high and 9 meters wide, split curiously in half and balanced on two small, natural pedestals. The origin of the Al Naslaa rock formation is unknown. by OccludedFug
Our argument is that colonialism didn't directly destroy the entirety of Saudian Arabian history
You know, rebutting the original point being made, instead of the one you switched to after realising the mistake but not admitting it
underthingy t1_ja13xvx wrote
Again strawmanning.
>Our argument is that colonialism didn't directly destroy the entirety of Saudian Arabian history
I never said it did.
>You know, rebutting the original point being made, instead of the one you switched to after realising the mistake but not admitting it
I have checked back through the thread and noone made that claim.
2KoolAwYe t1_ja14k54 wrote
Look harder, stop doubling down to cope, we all make mistakes
underthingy t1_ja183d4 wrote
You should learn how to read. That comment doesn't say what you are claiming it does.
2KoolAwYe t1_ja2rxmh wrote
What does it mean then?
underthingy t1_ja4oayj wrote
That it contributed in some way to the current situation they are in.
Not that it was the sole cause of the destruction of the entire Saudi history as you are claiming.
2KoolAwYe t1_ja72vm1 wrote
Yeah no, that's not what they meant and it's pretty obvious.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments