Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Fetlocks_Glistening t1_j88a4s7 wrote

What about Britain? Didn't they serve meals in the 19th century?

7

Nanojack t1_j88dpkd wrote

Yes, but English cuisine was not widely admired or emulated. Lots of mutton in vinegar sauce or pease porridge.

27

quequotion t1_j88eomi wrote

>English cuisine was not widely admired or emulated

According to every British comedian it remains that way today.

18

Nanojack t1_j88g92d wrote

There's a reason the national dish of the UK is curry.

24

777IRON t1_j8bo62h wrote

I once had a British woman get very upset with me when I informed her that curry and kebabs are not “British Cuisine”. She strongly disagreed.

0

pineappleshnapps t1_j8bpxfs wrote

That’s awesome. They’ve adopted something so thoroughly that it’s become their national dish.

3

psymunn t1_j8c70te wrote

Also many of the curries they eat were indeed invented in Britain (by Indian migrants). Butter chicken is British in the same way orange chicken is form California not China

7

pseudangelos t1_j8ff44h wrote

I disagree too. Food culture travels and evolves. We have been eating curries in the UK since the 18th century - at what point do we get to call it our own?

It's as silly as telling an American that he can't consider pizza a national food because it comes from Italy.

2

777IRON t1_j8fm08q wrote

I never said it wasn’t or couldn’t be a “national food”. I said it isn’t British Cuisine. Indian cuisine thriving in Britain doesn’t make it British cuisine.

There isn’t an American alive who calls Chinese food American, or Pizza American. They’ll call it’s Italian American cuisine at most.

Beef Wellington is British cuisine. I don’t claim it’s Canadian just because I can get it at the pub down the road.

Serious imperialist attitude on you. I can see you’ve kept that from the 18th century along with the curry.

−1

pseudangelos t1_j8hhk2j wrote

Embracing and celebrating influences from various world cultures is a 'serious imperialist attitude'? I suppose we're not allowed to consider tea part of UK culture either since we got it from trading too. Maybe we should also force India to rework most of its country's recipes to remove all the chillis and tomatoes they got from the Americas.

In fact, let's just force every country to only use ingredients and techniques from their own borders, and see what a marvelous world foodscape we have then.

1

777IRON t1_j8kdq1o wrote

You are so dumb. If you go to an Indian restaurant in the UK, it’s still an Indian restaurant. It’s not a British restaurant.

It’s an Indian restaurant in Britain. No one’s advocating for banning curries in the UK.

Victim mentality is strong too you big baby.

−1

pseudangelos t1_j8krqmv wrote

Personal insults and an apparent inability to comprehend what I wrote. Bye.

1

futurespice t1_j89087g wrote

According to anyone who ever ate a meal in the UK it remains that way today.

10

Jillredhanded t1_j8bmhdk wrote

The quality of their cusine and the beauty of their women are why Brittania ruled the sea.

3

-_kevin_- t1_j88pab7 wrote

And monkey's brains, though popular in Cantonese cuisine, are not often to be found in Washington D.C.

6

SirSassyCat t1_j88ju99 wrote

What do you mean? Most of what the west currently calls Indian stems from victorian era England.

−2

futurespice t1_j890d6m wrote

Most of what you can find in Indian restaurants in "the west" are fairly generic north Indian dishes like butter chicken, saag paneer etc.

6

SirSassyCat t1_j8al3bu wrote

Which were all created in Britain. Butter chicken isn't a dish that actually exists in India.

3

futurespice t1_j8ambu9 wrote

You're maybe thinking of tandoori masala (now actually not so uncommon in India). Saag paneer, tandoori chicken, and butter chicken absolutely do exist in India and have for some time.

I think it's fair to say many dishes we think of as traditional Indian cuisine are tied to colonialism in general due to use of non native ingrédients such as chili peppers or tomato, sure, but not that it all originates from the UK.

4

verylittleinsight t1_j8guqom wrote

Hey mate I'm an Anglo chef that once thought that, too.

At this point we basically just need to dip our hats to India and add a pint of cream or tomatoes to whatever they thought of first.

1

hypatiatextprotocol t1_j88fuch wrote

They joined the transition to service à la russe, although:

"Victorian cuisine did not appeal to everyone. British cooks like Mrs. A. B. Marshall encouraged boiling and mutating food until it no longer tasted or resembled its original form. Victorian England became known throughout Europe for its bland and unappetizing food but many housewives cooked in this fashion since it was the safest way to prepare food before refrigeration."

7