horseydeucey t1_je31hr9 wrote
In 1936, Johnstown, Pa had a flood (not to be confused with the larger, more devastating 1889 Johnstown flood) that killed dozens and did about $43 million of property damage.
Pennsylvania started a tax to cover the damages. At the time it was 10% of all liquor sales.
As of 2019, the Johnstown Flood tax was still in effect - only it had grown to 18%. I don't know if it's in place today. I'm sure some Pennsylvanian knows.
CrieDeCoeur t1_je39vnw wrote
In Canada they enacted a sales tax for the first time during WWII as a temporary measure to help pay for the war effort. Guess what? We still got the fucking sales tax.
MooseTed t1_je3gcyr wrote
We have toll road in my state that was supposed to stop when the original build was paid for. The bill was paid off in 1993. Still got tolls...
GreasyPeter t1_je57rqj wrote
This is extremely common and yet when old school conservatives warn about this type of thing everyone tells them they're off their rockers. I don't agree with a lot of what conservatives say, but this clearly is one slippery slope that gets greased regularly.
Matthew_C1314 t1_je57clw wrote
Texas? If not, then we got the same problems. They built toll roads that are the only direct connections between a few minor cities. Supposed to stop once paid for, got paid off 15 years ago. But I still pay $6 to drive 9 miles with traffic.
sponge_bob_ t1_je3bhxe wrote
got to be ready for WWIII!
ivowtothee t1_je3k4ra wrote
Pretty sure it was income tax (even more $$) and it was for ww1
TheRaphMan t1_je5rnhn wrote
In Quebec our taxes are supposed to go towards fixing our roads.
it doesn't fucking show
DroolingIguana t1_je5bdfe wrote
We didn't get a federal sales tax in Canada until 1991.
CrieDeCoeur t1_je5qch6 wrote
I meant Ontario provincial tax. There was no sales taxes at all prior
E1520 t1_je636kj wrote
Most countries do. VAT, salestax, moms.
It's the same thing and started as temporary.
Captain-Griffen t1_je66lxe wrote
It's a VAT. No one uses straight sales tax other than the USA because they're stupid. No, they aren't the same thing.
Mitthrawnuruo t1_je7muus wrote
It is still there.
And a couple years ago, multiple towns in the area had to be evacuated.
Due to the risk of dams breaking
[deleted] t1_je32l11 wrote
[deleted]
dmr11 t1_je4ot7q wrote
Could legislators get votes by promising to repeal such an outdated tax policy, or does the tax money outweigh even that incentive?
acebandaged t1_je4ydl2 wrote
Probably economic health of the state is more important, as it should be. People shouldn't go around getting rid of taxes, they're what allows the country to function.
srentiln t1_je563eh wrote
While I agree that we shouldn't just go on a tax cutting spree to avoid economic harm, I think taxes that had a pre-defined conditional expiration as part of the original wording when passed should honor that condition.
acebandaged t1_je6nd19 wrote
Why? They followed proper legislative processes, and voters haven't made it an issue.
srentiln t1_je6rbcv wrote
Because those were the terms agreed to when it was passed, and voters were not given an opportunity to comment on changes to those terms. If this was a business contract, such a violation would render it void.
Glute_Thighwalker t1_je6521u wrote
It is, but it’s just our general liquor tax now. Funds aren’t specifically ear marked for anything.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments