Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

wopwopdoowop t1_iuhsv7j wrote

> Research suggests King Tut died circa 1323 B.C.E. from a gangrene infection at age 19. The infection was possibly the result of a broken leg.

> Early investigations pointed to bone fragments in Tutankhamun’s skull to propose the theory that he died from a blow to the head by political rivals. However, a full scan of his body in 2006 found the damage to King Tut’s skull occurred after his death due to bad handling of his mummy.

> Another 2010 study of Tutankhamun’s DNA found he had malaria and was disabled, requiring a cane to walk, which could have precipitated his fall and made his leg infection worse

TIL he died of a broken leg

319

Dawnawaken92 t1_iui5xyl wrote

Just because he was riding on it doesn't mean he was the one driving it. Again you cannot prove without a shadow of a doubt. As you said. He has used canes. That leaves area for doubt

27

tfaddy2 t1_iui9edq wrote

> if y'all cant go read a book

You're talking about a topic that famously has conflicting positions, you didn't mention any book and actually just posted a Wikipedia link of a controversial archaeologist.

Don't be a pretentious twat. It's not that I disagree with your position but you're doing an awful job at defending it.

39

Calion t1_iuiazv1 wrote

This makes me angry.

5

SEND_PUNS_PLZ t1_iuifbnq wrote

Wow I can’t believe he was alive all the way up until that point

14

NorthernViews t1_iuiiziw wrote

Poor guy died too young, hosting a God and being reckless letting it use him and takeover.

−11

Calion t1_iuin39l wrote

More that I feel lied to. There was this whole persuasive book that claimed that he was murdered, and it was fascinating, but now come to find out that it was just mishandling. Grrr.

6

Ill-Organization-719 t1_iuivqtw wrote

Sounds like the same thing that happened to the last guy that asked too many questions about Tuts death.

24

DrDiddle t1_iuiyfn1 wrote

Have you seen the research on his many physical deformities and definite heavy inbreeding? I haven’t really heard anyone make the claim that he was an athletic hunter before. Where did you get that info?

42

Containedmultitudes t1_iuj76n8 wrote

Sounds like you haven’t actually done any reading on the topic if you think that’s a troll comment, it was widely speculated that he had wide hips and breasts for years (athough it has since been proven false and just a stylistic choice in artistic depictions) and he definitely had a foot problem.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/100216-king-tut-malaria-bones-inbred-tutankhamun

20

Rosebunse t1_iuj86ki wrote

I mean, it makes sense if you consider that his whole death was just an accident and his palace was left scrambling to provide him with something. Of course, it did work out for him. The placement and size of his tomb and his relative obscurity meant that grave-robbers didn't steak from him like they did with other tombs.

16

Rosebunse t1_iuj8kii wrote

I think he was most definitely disabled, but that doesn't mean he couldn't still be a very active young man. Lots of disabled people still play sports and get around. Why, my friend is paralyzed from the neck down and holds a normal job and is building a Twitch channel. Why, I bet his disability just made Tut even more determined to be as active as any other Egyptian young man at the time.

And he had the money and resources to secure mobility aids and even customize his equipment to be what he needed it to be.

14

Eaglekingoftheskies t1_iujhy9y wrote

> He liked horses and chariots and there are descriptions of him hunting and even fighting wars on them. > >

So this is not actually much evidence. Ancient egyptains did a lot of propaganda and we have depections of pharaohs who never even went to war smiting their enemies. Then there was Ramses going through a full propaganda complain where he replaced the names off the works of older pharaohs and said they were his own and where he lied about the outcome of the Battle of Kadesh.

There's a lot of propaganda in ancient eygpt and King Tut would have been depicted hunting and riding chariots regardless of whether he was disabled or not because that was what was expected of a pharaoh. They were all depicted as youthful and invigorated and as warriors.

The egyptains would also pretty much erase from history any humiliating defeats or anything they didn't like.

42

goonts_tv t1_iuji7tx wrote

Just like Bob Saget

−5

CrossXFir3 t1_iuji962 wrote

I've done a fair bit of research on him myself. Was fascinated in him at one point. I've read a lot of evidence that he was quite disabled from inbreading. But have also heard he was into hunting. However, there's some thought he was more interested in going with hunters and watching than actually participating. He'd have to have been quite strong for a disabled 12 year old.

1

GMaster7 t1_iujk34p wrote

TIL that King Tut had damage on the back of his skull

18

jaysin1983 t1_iuk0bxy wrote

Imagine being the guy who dropped tuts skull

3

1320Fastback t1_iuk584q wrote

Imagine your at an ancient Egyptian ceremony watching your dead King being prepared for burial and bro just drops his head

2