Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Hapankaali t1_isgotty wrote

Yep - but that empire was much smaller. My point was just that the British didn't glue together some disparate small realms, there was a precedent for a (mostly) unified Indian subcontinent.

1

Smart_Sherlock t1_isgpdc2 wrote

Not that much smaller. It was comparable to what Mughals controlled for most of their existence.

Concept of Bharat was indeed there, even in times of Chandragupta as documented by Chanakya himself.

Places can have same culture (including religion) but at the same time be politically divided. This has happened many times in history

1