Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MechanicalCheese t1_it67sgz wrote

The last bit is a little surprising to me. I would think the taller you were, the less distance you had to fall. Assuming the roof doesn't crush in too far, the top of my head is generally a couple inches from it. That seems like a far easier impact to absorb than dropping a foot. I'd expect weight to have a much greater impact than height in terms of injury risk.

2

juicythiccdrumstick t1_it6kdh2 wrote

Neck bones are all about the same size regardless of height. 5’3” woman weighing 130 pounds is much less force on the neck than a 7’2” 380 pound man.

1

MechanicalCheese t1_it89wj7 wrote

That why I mentioned weight being the bigger factor - I expect a 5'8" 380lb man would have a comparable if not worse risk.

As for size - here's an example (as I'm packing for a camping trip today) - if I drive down a bumpy road with a glass bottle in a tall cooler, it's much more likely to break than in a short cooler, as it can't so easily develop and speed before impact with space constraints.

Supporting your body weight with your neck is never good, but being dropped on your head is a lot worse.

I'm having trouble finding data on rollovers in particular. For most vehicles accident injuries, shorter folks are far worse off.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217531/

1