TheWrongFusebox t1_ixgnhry wrote
AKA cheese-eating surrender units
-Daetrax- t1_ixgp6vm wrote
Ironic considering the origin of SI units.
TheWrongFusebox t1_ixh24y0 wrote
Not so much irony as that was the joke. But clearly not a good one.
-Daetrax- t1_ixhue1z wrote
No, you were just wrong. Pounds and ounces are not SI units.
TheWrongFusebox t1_ixhxi0s wrote
> No, you were just wrong.
No, I wasn't.
> Pounds and ounces are not SI units.
I know.
-Daetrax- t1_ixhycnf wrote
Go ahead and reread your original comment buddy.
TheWrongFusebox t1_ixi6r34 wrote
I know what I wrote, chum.
DaemonRai t1_ixgoaup wrote
Wisconsin? Imperial units are what the US uses.
Ameisen t1_ixidv8y wrote
No, they are not. The US uses US customary units (technically, it doesn't have a name - the code simply specifies it as "traditional systems of weights and measures".
There are significant differences between British Imperial and USC.
DaemonRai t1_ixjiz5s wrote
Avoirdupois is a system of measuring weight based on the fact that sixteen ounces are in a pound. The metric system is based on grams, and the avoirdupois system is based on pounds. - That's freedom units they're talking about.
And from the Avoirdupois System Wikipedia page - In 1959, by international agreement, the definitions of the pound and ounce became standardized in countries which use the pound as a unit of mass. The International Avoirdupois Pound was then created. It is the everyday system of weights used in the United States. It is still used, in varying degrees, in everyday life in the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and some other former British colonies, despite their official adoption of the metric system.
Ameisen t1_ixk0ngl wrote
And those freedom units are a part of the USCS.
And the US doesn't use Imperial still. Imperial was only used in the Empire and Commonwealth.
snow_michael t1_ixocrjv wrote
We're quite happy you still think of yourselves as a colony of the British Empire :)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments