Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Gemmabeta t1_ivb3w7a wrote

> The topics depicted in the novels and poems were wide-ranging, including women's suffrage, physical disability, sexual impairment, secret sex societies, bestiality, India-rubber dildos, slave rape, duels, mock crucifixions, Turkish harems, and prophylactic devices. The Pearl often contained extensive political commentary, including references to the Reform Bills and Contagious Diseases Acts.

Back when people preferred to intersperse their wanking with deep discussions on the property requirement for voting.

211

enderandrew42 t1_ivb552e wrote

The joke used to be "I only read Playboy for the articles", but in reality it had tons of great journalism, short fiction and very few pages of nudes. People were interspersing their wanks with political commentary with Playboy.

132

Individual-Equal-230 t1_ivc0kxc wrote

Basically. I mean, you had pulitzer/Nobel winners writing essays, and showing some bush.

Then Larry Flynt shows up with people pounding it out, showing clits & what not

48

candygram4mongo t1_ivd1sie wrote

> you had pulitzer/Nobel winners writing essays, and showing some bush.

You wouldn't think to look at him, but Norman Mailer had an incredible set of gams.

9

enderandrew42 t1_ivc0x95 wrote

You're not wrong.

7

Individual-Equal-230 t1_ivc1qsa wrote

Hugh Hefner was generally trash person, & likely abuser. But that dude had great taste in authors/contributors

19

Carighan t1_ivebnva wrote

It's always weird to me because it's difficult to know how to feel about it, but yeah. The publisher Hugh Hefner did some amazing work, even though as a boss and a person he apparently was an utter asshole from all I can find on it.

4

CrieDeCoeur t1_ivbnrgl wrote

Penthouse mag too, iirc. Then Hustler arrived on the scene and it was all about the wanking from there on out.

13

enderandrew42 t1_ivbobel wrote

Penthouse seemed to straddle the line with journalism but more nudes, more explicit nudes and "Penthouse Letters". Hustler leaned fully into porn and taboo humor.

11

P2029 t1_ivcsjj8 wrote

Gotta have some good material when the post nut clarity kicks in

6

j_cruise t1_ivczsg8 wrote

Also, for literally decades, they only showed bare breasts.

5

Pligles t1_ivdxeay wrote

Turns out post nut clarity is amazing for reading about politics and understanding social commentary

3

NeokratosRed t1_ivdnui8 wrote

The wisdom wank might have helped readers think clearly about important matters!

2

HiveMindKing t1_ivebd39 wrote

Isn’t that what people do on Reddit now? For you all know the very person replying to you could be guilty.

1

jsilv0 t1_ivb2wrr wrote

Because that kind of obscenity was to be reserved for the real life British high society

68

DasherPack OP t1_ivb33so wrote

64

sideways_cat t1_ivczppz wrote

Jfc. I refuse to type what the “phrase” is in fear of getting a knock on the door from the FBI

13

ThePhiff t1_ivd4rel wrote

It somehow makes the content of the poem even WORSE.

JFC

😳😳😳

4

battlelevel t1_ivdcpd5 wrote

Yikes. I was expecting something gross, but that was just creepy.

7

Oznog99 t1_ivdjsim wrote

Yep, wow. Victorian literary porn.

Best title: "SUB-UMBRA, OR SPORT AMONG THE SHE-NOODLES"

She-noodles. I still don't know what that means.

12

bigbangbilly t1_ivev4wk wrote

I thought that was filler for the acrostic

Didn't know I was missing out on it by skipping it

2

TishMiAmor t1_ivbkrh1 wrote

If I know one thing about Victorian erotica it’s that flagellation will be heavily featured. I always wonder whether it was a genuinely more prevalent kink at the time, whether authors at the time just automatically assumed their audiences would want a whipping scene, or some combination of both.

18

godisanelectricolive t1_ivcr6eg wrote

Briching used to be a common punishment in schools back then. I wonder if that helped to influence tastes.

18

dabigua t1_ivcnpzq wrote

I had a paperback copy when I was younger. Lots of birch rods in those stories. Lots of birch rods.

7

Positive-Source8205 t1_ivc1vtf wrote

“To the editor of The Pearl: A Magazine of Facetiae and Voluptuous Reading

Sir: I never though this would befall me …”

17

Flicksterea t1_ivcblng wrote

'Rampant engine of love' is a phrase new to me. I'm going to have many laughs reading these. My lesbian sensibilities are positively tickled.

9

Rossum81 t1_ivfu2ai wrote

Well, there’s a new fetish for me!

1

Flicksterea t1_ivgpvm9 wrote

I am actually oddly addicted to reading The Pearl now. It's rather titillating.

2

UsrnameInATrenchcoat t1_ivb46r1 wrote

This so vulgar and crass that I'm gonna jerk off to rule 34 just to wash the taste off my muff maraudor

8

Ur_A_Lizard-Harry t1_ivbh72p wrote

How was it underground but printed @ Oxford?

7

karrimycele t1_ivdtb6v wrote

Reprinted much later. You could get it in book form in the 20th Century. I had a copy.

3

Xanlthorpe t1_ivbvivb wrote

I read a copy of The Pearl back in the early 80s. It was being circulated as "historical fiction." It was no more scandalous than the average Penthouse Letter to the Editor or story of the 80s.

6

[deleted] t1_ivb3xwi wrote

The fiction magazine pearl was banned for writing about real life pearl necklaces.

5

Landlubber77 t1_ivb37to wrote

I wonder if issue 11 was actually better than 12, like how Game of Thrones would always have the penultimate episode of the season be the banger while the season finale more or less dealt with the aftermath and set-up for the next season.

3

srv50 t1_ivcaqpn wrote

They had standards for obscenity!!??!! /s

3

contacts_eyes t1_ivd4rdk wrote

This post brought up a memory of when i was like ten or eleven and my cousin had some edgy magazine, it wasnt like a playboy or anything but it definitely had some weird content, anyway it was just there in her room and I decided to look at it one day. The last few pages had an erotic story in it and it was about a guy who went to a female dom and she made him drink pee. That shit is still burned on my psyche because up until that point I don’t think i had read anything that weird before.

3

nerdwa t1_ive9kcd wrote

I read a copy of The Pearl when I was in middle school. Mines was written by John Steinbeck though.

3

TaleWrong6444 t1_ivb4vxd wrote

Wait until they hear about the royal family...

1

A40 t1_ivbb80v wrote

It was sub-standard obscenity?

1

Fickle-Friendship-31 t1_ivclzww wrote

I had a book with a bunch of the stories from this newsletter. Wild shit.

1

karrimycele t1_ivdt5mn wrote

Had a copy of the book as a youngster in the seventies, (1970s). They compiled the whole thing. And, yes, I was using it for its intended purpose.

1

HankHippoppopalous t1_ivdtjbd wrote

Like. I feel like I still could rub one off whilst reading about the dart of love all impatient to enter the mossy grotto between your thighs....

1

Y34rZer0 t1_ivefsvw wrote

there’s a cool documentary on the black propaganda (sexual propaganda) unit the British very reluctantly ran during World War II. There is a female artist on it who tells a story about creating an image of Hitler with his penis out. She said the rather stuffy British offices directed her to draw it, then after a pause added ‘ don’t make it too large‘

1

drekwithoutpolitics t1_ivfesyd wrote

Can someone tell me what the fuck “simultaneously” means in the title?

They were simultaneously devoted to sex, incest, and flagellation?

The issues were simultaneously published?

“Three erotic tales simultaneously,”

r/Titlegore

1

DasherPack OP t1_ivfnzex wrote

That every issue had three serial stories at the same time.

2

drekwithoutpolitics t1_ivfob3y wrote

Aha! Thank you, that makes sense.

I’m a little surprised it only lasted one year. I guess I assumed they could keep it under wraps longer

1

RedYakArt t1_ivfwdw6 wrote

Did they promote rape, bestiality, incest, etc or just report on it?

1