iTanooki t1_iwlhiqt wrote
By definition, doesn’t everyone poop their pants “after holding in their stool as long as they can”?
NebXan t1_iwlntle wrote
No, everyone holds their bowels for just as long as they need to in order to get to a toilet without shitting themselves.
How long a person could hold their bowels is another story.
Awellplanned t1_iwlzyet wrote
Check out “The Mule” it’s a movie about an Australian guy who smuggled drugs and they kept him in a hotel until he pooped them out.
neotericnewt t1_iwm61q1 wrote
The way you wrote this makes it sound like this scene is the main part of the movie. Like the whole movie is just this guy in a hotel while people wait around for him to poop out drugs.
DarkC0ntingency t1_iwmabho wrote
This is exactly what I had assumed after reading his comment having never seen the film
TwoKeezPlusMz t1_iwnz3ww wrote
Was it not?
M-S-S t1_iwml3hd wrote
I am writing this as a one-act stage play now. Thanks for the ideas.
willie_caine t1_iwmvuj0 wrote
Waiting for Godot Poop and Drugs
OneSidedDice t1_iwo4rua wrote
Waiting for Bidet?
Ok_Concentrate_75 t1_iwn611h wrote
Please write a monolog where the person discusses the irony of others ingesting something he just pooped out
Zelensexual t1_iwn2xqx wrote
'Encopresis.' In a theater near you soon.
poopmuskets t1_ixncplv wrote
The stool mule.
a_stoic_sage t1_iwnp7ro wrote
No Vacancy: The Rectum Monologue
darvs7 t1_iwn7o7m wrote
The Mule (2018) USA 1h56m
A drug smuggler for a Mexican cartel is kept in an hotel room until he poops.
IMDb Rating: 7/10.
LiamtheV t1_iwmwdwy wrote
dragon_bacon t1_iwn3x01 wrote
That is the large portion of the movie, it's disgusting and thrilling.
PhallusInChainz t1_iwo0isg wrote
That is actually the main part of the movie
Brbcan t1_iwo3nv1 wrote
Look, Australian cinema isn't exactly high-budget...
Jjex22 t1_iwmpxog wrote
That does sound like a low budget aussie film tbh
edstirling t1_iwnqz0l wrote
Its all in one take too. A work of art.
willengineer4beer t1_iwo0mwd wrote
Luckily they shot it more than once.
The first take was left on the cutting room floor.
The theatrical release was “take number two”.
RalphieGlick t1_iwms1s9 wrote
I think what you mean to say is that the whole movie is just this guy in a hotel room until he develops the condition widely known as encopresis
TheMcNabbs t1_iwo4qx7 wrote
The... clint eastwood movie? That takes place in America?
teratogenic17 t1_iwnivym wrote
Ask a bus driver...
Cuillin t1_iwligqe wrote
I think the “as long as they can” part isn’t necessarily true.
Some people receive the ol’ signal and go to the porcelain throne straight away.
InappropriateTA t1_iwlkkt1 wrote
He didn’t say that everyone holds stuff in as long as they can. Just that when the outcome is pooping your pants, the holding of your bowels preceding that is always as long as you can.
ThingsIAlreadyKnow t1_iwlmrmg wrote
I think you both mistook the statement.
- Hold your bowels as long as possible
- Poop happens next.
blsterken t1_iwlnla2 wrote
As someone who has a todler at home, and who works with developmentally disabled adults, this is definitely not true for all individuals.
Cuillin t1_iwlzk1m wrote
No, there’s a difference between releasing when you sit down, and “holding it in as long as you can”
When you sit down isn’t necessarily as long as you can hold it; you could probably hold it in longer.
Taking a shit is just taking a shit, but holding it in as long as you can implies there’s a certain kind of um… emergency.
InappropriateTA t1_iwmj6r5 wrote
Right, what the guy above is saying I took to mean that people who are in an emergency situation where they have to hold it in and then end up pooping their pants, have held it in as long as they could.
Cuillin t1_iwmlx9v wrote
But that’s not what they said. They suggested ALL BM’s are the result of holding it in as long as you can
InappropriateTA t1_iwmqvrf wrote
> By definition, doesn’t everyone poop their pants “after holding in their stool as long as they can”?
I’m not reading it that way. The qualifier about pooping pants is important.
welshmanec2 t1_iwnozyf wrote
I had a dodgy belly one time, didn't feel like I needed to poop right at that moment, certainly wasn't holding it in or anything - but I casually coughed and sharted my pants there and then.
NolanSyKinsley t1_iwnoixe wrote
It isn't just pooping your pants once after holding it in. It is loss of bowel control for a longer period after the passage of the bowel impaction caused by holding it in for as long as possible.
Azudekai t1_iwn2m61 wrote
Sometimes they just take a chance on a dodgy fart
Liquid_Stool_ t1_iwo4c0o wrote
I can't be caged
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments