Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DefiantStomp t1_j1xrbob wrote

70 to 90 people. Accuracy and accountability for human lives.šŸ‘ŒšŸ¼

5

mattyondubs t1_j1xtlfw wrote

It was 1903, most bodies were never recovered so the actual count could not be officially confirmed

25

DirtyReseller t1_j1xw50l wrote

Didnā€™t they know who lived there? I may be over estimating the knowledge everyone had the at the time

−3

Blooopsalot t1_j1y84j1 wrote

There was a transient camp of 50ish people at the bottom and they had no idea how many had ā€œmoved onā€ at the time of the slide. (Itā€™s in the article-do not be impressed, I almost never read the article)

11

chrisbe2e9 OP t1_j1xuryc wrote

Think about that, 1903. It's almost 2023. So 120 years ago. In the middle of nowhere. It's amazing that we have records!

7

melkipersr t1_j1xs3nr wrote

Iā€™m not sure I understand your point. Are you remarking on the imprecision of the estimate?

2

FurtherUpheaval t1_j1ztcj2 wrote

It was a town owned by a mining company, they didnā€™t care that much about their slaves

1