Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Rust2 t1_j25sdaj wrote

Steve Martin won a Grammy for best bluegrass album in 2010.

17

ThirdFloorGreg t1_j27gste wrote

Sure. But that's because most Recording Academy members don't care about Bluegrass, but they do know who Steve Martin is. It's not like they have a limited number of votes to distribute, they can vote in every category whether they know anything about it (or have even listened to the nominees) or not. Steve Martin's album didn't win the Grammy, his name did.

Same reason Jethro Tull won the first (and technically only) Grammy for best Hard Rock/Metal performance.

0

Airp0w t1_j27lp3n wrote

Steve Martin is a genuinely incredible banjo player. He won for his album not his name. There's a reason nobody talks about who got ripped off that year...

4

ThirdFloorGreg t1_j27m5pe wrote

I'm not saying it's a bad album. I'm saying it got a bunch of votes that weren't seriously considered.

0

Rust2 t1_j27sx2u wrote

The question wasn’t asking who’s most deserving, but who’s been more successful in music coming from an acting career. I’d say Steve Martin’s music career has been a success in that right. His music has earned three Grammys (six nominations) and was nominated for two Tony awards, while his acting career has garnered only two major awards (one Oscar, one Emmy) albeit with 18 nominations.

3

ThirdFloorGreg t1_j298fk4 wrote

Awards shows are just industry insiders self-felating, they are useless as markers of actual success.

0

Airp0w t1_j27r9vn wrote

I agree I think it's a category that is not taken seriously most years.

1