Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

necromundus t1_j12n2i7 wrote

I have never heard Rudolph's nose referred to as 'bioluminescent'

101

FredSpoctopus t1_j13lm1c wrote

It's not wrong, but it kind of spoils the magic doesn't it?

51

CrackBingeIdea t1_j1471xs wrote

It implies bacteria are responsible though? That - doesn’t sound right? Come to think of it, I’ve never given any serious thought to what it might be. Magic I suppose.

−8

Seraph062 t1_j14aked wrote

> It implies bacteria are responsible though?

Not at all. There are tons of non-bacteria bioluminescent organisms.
The example that leaps to mind being fireflies.

24

CrackBingeIdea t1_j14c6st wrote

Oh I see, I always misunderstood that term then

11

MentochTheMindTaker t1_j15cc4p wrote

It seems so, bio means life and luminescent means to produce light so it's simply any living organism which can produce light.

8

CrackBingeIdea t1_j15fk4q wrote

Yeah, now it seems obvious... I just always figured it needed some symbiotic bacteria existing within an organism. Huh. Thanks man, every day is a school day.

8

aelwero t1_j1607aa wrote

It's an understandable assumption IMHO. My mind goes directly to algae when bioluminescence is mentioned, simply because it's the only form I've seen firsthand, and was around it quite a bit.

6