Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Wingardium_Draconis t1_j59gfi4 wrote

Thats fantastic. I mean, I loved the way the heist was planned. Out of the box and bold thinking.

2

masken21 t1_j59hn2b wrote

Okey fbi-4heads. Its a movie, there is a lot of things that are put in to places that would have boken the script in real life. Like the film crew, in real life they would have called the cop's at once. Now in the movie they are just hiding behind the cameras and out of picture DOING NOTHING. That plan would have been doomed to fail.

−10

kerkula t1_j59ijhu wrote

wait what? The FBI investigated the writer and not the federal reserve????

72

TDiffRob6876 t1_j59jezr wrote

Sounds more like an interview than interrogation. They wanted to know how he knew what he knew and consulted with him as a subject matter expert since his information was accurate. They were looking for feedback to increase security measures.

202

Landlubber77 t1_j59muhc wrote

It all seemed a little far fetched until they got to the part where Bruce Willis used a dump truck full of gold bricks to surf a gigantic wave through an aqueduct and then the authorities couldn't deny how likely this was to actually happen and began their investigation.

446

DrFriedGold t1_j59x2i9 wrote

It might seem absurd but the FBI has to look into these things just in case.

Adam Savage, from Mythbusters, has an amusing tale when the FBI called him after he left an answerphone message on a wrong number talking about a 'thermal detonator' he was making

855

HotPocket_Consumed t1_j59x9xa wrote

Investigated is a misleading word. You can communicate with the FBI without being under investigation.

21

designer_of_drugs t1_j5a01ra wrote

They almost certainly didn’t “investigate.” This would have been closer to a “chat.” Not everyone at the FBI is an idiot and if someone has an interesting idea relevant to their interests, they’ll say what’s up to see if they can learn anything to revise this approach to a problem.

39

Ihavenoideawhatidoin t1_j5aa234 wrote

> they’ll say what’s up to see if they can learn anything to revise this approach to a problem.

That’s called an investigation lol. Just because it was the FBI doing it doesn’t mean that there’s needs to be a crime involved. If argue that they’re not idiots because they investigated this. The real idiots wouldn’t have investigated and waited until someone actually tried it.

18

Voidbearer2kn17 t1_j5aa583 wrote

You should look into Leverage. There was an episode in Season 1 where the team are in a plane that is crashing due to a virus loaded in via the black box. One of the family of the execs enjoyed the show but pointed out that the plane shown doesn't make the flight. Nothing about the virus not working in that way.

Some of the villains in that show, based on real-world events are actually harrowing.

2

Groundbreaking_War52 t1_j5afho3 wrote

Was one of the last big movies that captured authentic, gritty NYC - complete with horrible traffic, abundant litter, and surprising kind, helpful, and weird residents. A ton of real locations used and you can tell.

This was before studios tried to either pass off Toronto or Atlanta as NYC - or just CGI in a bunch of landmarks.

301

clichesaurus t1_j5afplw wrote

Some heist movies never get finished because the crew realizes it's more lucrative to irl that shit

17

RustyShackleford1122 t1_j5b34at wrote

I also feel like stealing 13 dump trucks in the city isn't the easiest thing to do either. Plus the bad guys impersonated the city Engineers which is how they got access to these areas. But what happened to the real City Engineers they would have eventually shown up and the game would have been up

30

SolidPoint t1_j5b6vtx wrote

The screenwriter for “Simon Says” which was retro-fit to become a Die Hard movie

3

NetDork t1_j5blz6i wrote

Writer to FBI: Holy shit, you mean this would really work?!? Damn, wish I'd kept it to myself....

3

erocknine t1_j5bs5m8 wrote

Look around! You could steal City Hawl!

7

RedJay1982 t1_j5buwhh wrote

But wasn’t the plan to take over the Federal Reserve posing as civil engineers to repair damage? The initial subway bomb was to render the alarms unusable so that the FR turned them off.

2

BisexualCactusNoises t1_j5buy22 wrote

I'm really tired of us making public really good plans on screwing over the government, even if it is artistic.

−5

LameBMX t1_j5c23r7 wrote

Thanks and fuck you. Now my brain can't be unwired to catch details like that for the rest of my life.

Though in a strange twist, I know have a greater understanding why Cleveland is always used by marvel since Ohio doesn't exist.

9

nitefang t1_j5c66if wrote

It is really interesting though, I just did some VERY SHALLOW research into RFID security because I'm about to be traveling internationally. It turns out that paying anything extra for an RFID blocking wallet or passport holder is essentially a waste of money.

Short list of reasons is

  1. For most credit cards, you can't make a transaction with only the RFID info which could be potentially skimmed and copied. Even when you don't have to enter a PIN number or anything, there is a verification process going on that can't be saved and used again later.
  2. While security experts and "white-hat/grey-hat hackers" at the DEF-CON "hacker convention" proved it is possible to skim RFID data at long range, it appears no criminals have found a way to use this technology to steal information. At least there aren't any known cases of it being done to steal credit card data for nefarious reasons successfully.
  3. In the case of Passports, the information transmitted is encrypted, for it to be useful to skim a passport you'd also need access to an encrypted and secured government database.
  4. For large purchases and withdrawals, you should be required to enter a pin number.

​

I won't pretend to be an expert on this, I don't fully grasp how various public-key encryption technology works (tried to learn a few times, always seems like magic or math only a genius can understand). But here is an article I found.

https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/are-rfid-blocking-products-worth-your-money-we-asked-an-expert/

TL;DR: RFID isn't even that insecure, at least not anymore, I'm not sure what the credit card companies were freaking out about. If you are really worried about it, RFID wallets aren't too expensive, and just check for close-range skimmers by pulling on card readers to make sure they are real.

89

Rampage_Rick t1_j5c7g5w wrote

Plus all the news anchors are from Vancouver too.

Chris Gailus is in Sonic the Hedgehog. Tony Parsons was in The Pledge and Saving Silverman (and Masterminds, which has parallels to DHWAV plus Patrick Stewart in a mustache!) Tamara Taggart was in a ton of movies in the early 2000s.

1

a_rainbow_serpent t1_j5c9zlx wrote

Security on paywave/ rfid transactions is the spend limit ($100), transaction analytics and insurance. I had some teenagers pinch my card and go on a short shopping spree. The bank reversed the 20 odd transactions that I couldn’t identify without a second question.

25

lampstore t1_j5ccpjf wrote

Sure, but the writer’s real gem was how to get 4 gallons of water.

4

oceanduciel t1_j5cmbvn wrote

Seriously? Couldn’t they find something better to do? Like, actually making sure victims of various crimes get justice instead. Since the cops are so fucking useless.

−4

bak3donh1gh t1_j5coz7j wrote

God that's low. Mines lower than $200 for sure. I've been pretty lucky in that the only time I lost a credit card at the bus stop, a nice older gentleman found it. Called all the people with the same last name in my area, and I think got in contact with my Grandpa at the time. I don't think I had noticed yet that I had lost it. I also didn't even know about Tap and pay at the time, somehow. So after he ID me when I came to pick it up and said well it's a good thing they don't have my pin, he explained that CCs have Tap on them.

Nowadays, I use Tap on my watch when I can.

7

disruptioncoin t1_j5csmgf wrote

There was a vulnerability for a while where some researchers found that they could exceed the transaction value limit for "tap to pay" (RFID) by changing the currency on the app to a different currency (they changed it from US dollars to yen or something, for example). Typically you can only charge like $35 that way without any kind of pin or anything. They showed you could just tap your phone to someone's wallet in passing and charge thousands of dollars to their card. Imagine walking through the subway with an amplifier antenna on your phone and zapping thousands of dollars per person from every card you pass. I believe they notified the offending banks before publishing this research but still, just goes to show that sometimes these things slip though the cracks. It's probably pretty safe now but idk, better safe than sorry.

4

bak3donh1gh t1_j5czomr wrote

I never bothered with the phone tap and pay b/ I was gunna pull something out, might as well be the card. That and some terminals being not compatible, while a card always is.

Though part of the reason for using the watch these days is it's basically always out and to help justify to myself how much I spent on it.(and now watch straps) Though when a terminal either doesn't have tap or the spot is in a weird spot I look kinda dumb, or at least in my head i do.

2

HPmoni t1_j5ddplw wrote

You would need a ridiculous team of badasses to try it.

Pretty sure cops would swarm once it's been breached. Can't spend money if you're dead.

0

Jjex22 t1_j5dgbky wrote

That’s how I always remember it too, as one of the last blockbusters before GCI, every shot being filmed with grey and blue filters, etc.

It’s like we rewatched Band of Brothers over the Christmas period and I immediately noticed how they could portray night and capture all the essence of it being night whilst I could still see all the actors and set, but most shows and movies made in the last decade show darkness by being so dark and underexposed you can’t see anything on the screen at all u less you whack up the brightness and barricade the windows

5

nitefang t1_j5dh72a wrote

With 4 you can't just clone the card though, you also need the PIN which you cannot get via skimming. And I didn't see them explaining what method they used to skim the card.

0

nitefang t1_j5dhnqq wrote

Like I said, DEF-CON proved it was possible forever ago, but there haven't been large scale operations doing long range skimming. When it does happen it is done almost like a pick pocket or via a nefarious skimmer attached to a genuine POS.

1

bad_robot_monkey t1_j5dp3s1 wrote

It’s more along the lines of “what’s the most efficient way of stealing credit cards without getting caught, equipment used on-site or a remote hack and downloading thousands at a time?”

If you’re specifically targeted, it’s a different deal…but then you have to ask yourself why you were being specifically targeted…

1