ArkeryStarkery t1_j9u7w2u wrote
I'm so glad she got that cash. Everybody in Congress has to take dirty money to get there, but she's not beholden to those crypto-bros at all because they imploded so spectacularly.
Now she gets to do the work we sent her there to do.
sluttymcfuckstick t1_j9v753o wrote
Have you no scruples? So winning dirty and being beholden to special interests is Aok if it's your side doing it?
ArkeryStarkery t1_j9wae2d wrote
I used to think running a clean campaign and losing was superior, but then my candidates ran clean, got vote majorities, and still didn't make it into office, so I got realistic.
You didn't read all of my comment, though. I specifically said this was good because she's NOT beholden to these special interests. Because they're dumbasses who have no sway anywhere now.
sluttymcfuckstick t1_j9xejf4 wrote
Just cause they fucked up doesn't mean she wouldn't have held up her end of the bargain. She's a bought and paid for politician.
ArkeryStarkery t1_ja0embl wrote
We're doing the same thing we usually do; we're talking past each other. I hear what you're saying; what I'm trying to say in response here is that your point doesn't actually contradict mine.
HappilyhiketheHump OP t1_j9ybgtz wrote
Curious. Which majority vote getter candidate (where the rules state the election is decided by 50+1) didn’t get seated into office?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments