Submitted by whaletacochamp t3_10z510x in vermont
thisoneisnotasbad t1_j83qx96 wrote
Reply to comment by KITTYONFYRE in Can we stop with the antagonistic road rage bullshit on 89 please by whaletacochamp
You are wrong. Maybe In a place like Rutland where people are uncivilized they automatically revert to some antiquated rule akin to burning witches because ducks float or something like that but in the rest of the world, that is not the case. In fact in The rest of non Rutland Vermont you are considered the victim of road rage and the person who intentionally caused an accident can be charged with reckless driving.
Please, explain how a person charged with reckless driving, accident resulting is not at fault?
https://dmv.vermont.gov/enforcement-and-safety/road-safety/aggressive-driving
KITTYONFYRE t1_j84c7kb wrote
Because what if they slam on the brakes because there's a child running into the road? What if there's an animal? Or any other of a billion reasons to slam on the brakes. You need to give adequate distance to the person in front of you.
> In fact in The rest of non Rutland Vermont you are considered the victim of road rage and the person who intentionally caused an accident can be charged with reckless driving.
in fact in 100% of the world if you rear end someone insurance will place you at fault
samantha802 t1_j85gfts wrote
If you cut someone off and then slam on your breaks, they are not at fault. If they have a dashcam you are screwed and your insurance will have to pay for you deciding to drive like an idiot.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j86a2b9 wrote
sure, if you swerve into their lane and slam the brakes. that's not the premise of 99.99% of brake checks, in which the person you're following is already in your lane. fair enough on swerving in first though
and finally I'm not trying to le reddit you but *brakes
KITTYONFYRE t1_j84ch1z wrote
Because what if they slam on the brakes because there's a child running into the road? What if there's an animal? Or any other of a billion reasons to slam on the brakes. You need to give adequate distance to the person in front of you.
> In fact in The rest of non Rutland Vermont you are considered the victim of road rage and the person who intentionally caused an accident can be charged with reckless driving.
in fact in 100% of the world if you rear end someone insurance will place you at fault. really weird you looked up where I live, too. reddit is creepy
KITTYONFYRE t1_j84cjhx wrote
Because what if they slam on the brakes because there's a child running into the road? What if there's an animal? Or any other of a billion reasons to slam on the brakes. You need to give adequate distance to the person in front of you.
> In fact in The rest of non Rutland Vermont you are considered the victim of road rage and the person who intentionally caused an accident can be charged with reckless driving.
in fact in 100% of the world if you rear end someone insurance will place you at fault. really weird you looked up where I live, too. reddit is creepy
thisoneisnotasbad t1_j84hh07 wrote
I didn't look up where you live. You went off when someone called Rutland shitty and I remembered as I trolled you witch Rutland having the second highest crime rate in the state and you got all in a tizzy. I figured it worked once, may as well try again.
As for you examples, you are describing an accident not reckless driving and your 100% claim is 100% wrong.
Ohhh... And Rutland is shitty.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j869whs wrote
lol ok bud next time someone has to slam the brakes because a moose ran in the road and you slam into them because your dumb ass was following too close, let me know what the insurance agent says
thisoneisnotasbad t1_j86sa94 wrote
Go back to Rutland my man. You’re making a fool of yourself here.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j84btju wrote
Because what if they slam on the brakes because there's a child running into the road? What if there's an animal? Or any other of a billion reasons to slam on the brakes. You need to give adequate distance to the person in front of you.
> In fact in The rest of non Rutland Vermont you are considered the victim of road rage and the person who intentionally caused an accident can be charged with reckless driving.
in fact in 100% of the world if you rear end someone insurance will place you at fault
KITTYONFYRE t1_j84cb8y wrote
Because what if they slam on the brakes because there's a child running into the road? What if there's an animal? Or any other of a billion reasons to slam on the brakes. You need to give adequate distance to the person in front of you.
> In fact in The rest of non Rutland Vermont you are considered the victim of road rage and the person who intentionally caused an accident can be charged with reckless driving.
in fact in 100% of the world if you rear end someone insurance will place you at fault. really weird you looked up where I live, too. reddit is creepy
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments