Submitted by BudsKind802 t3_1133zhb in vermont
ThirdFirstName t1_j8teypy wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Northfield's Police Chief Takes Flak for His Provocative Public Stances by BudsKind802
Oh no again I believe that female identifying individuals should have spaces free of male identifying individuals. No I don’t think this should be determined by their gamete production.
No it is your definition and it’s not backed by the science period.
[deleted] t1_j8tgwhz wrote
lmao it's not my definition. Show me one scientific source that has a different definition of female.
You can't "identify" as female if you were born male. You could identify as a woman, but male and female are traits you are born with.
I empathize with people who wish it was different but not everything in life is how you wish it is. Males can never be females. Sorry dude.
And you have to accept your real beliefs that you believe that people who are born male should be allowed to enter spaces that women have designated for people born females only. Typical male privilege.
Going to just mute you, this feels like I'm huffing paint. Your cognitive dissonance is dominating your life.
ThirdFirstName t1_j8thqjn wrote
Haha just because you say it’s that way doesn’t mean your correct. These people exist and they always will do you will have to deal with that. Biologically the definition is gamete psychologically the definition is different. I can get you some sources on that if you want.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments