Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

hellibot t1_jdjhg9w wrote

I just meant in terms of your first few paragraphs about framing. I thought it was a neutral assessment of “who” owns STRs. I haven’t listened to the episode, so have no opinion on the full episode and whether it answered the listener’s question. I will say it sounds like like not enough housing has been built is an accurate assessment. Otherwise, there’d be enough housing for short-term and long-term inhabitants and housing would be cheaper.

0

headgasketidiot OP t1_jdjm093 wrote

If you didn't even know the question they were trying to answer, how can you disagree with my critique that the way they framed the answer was weird. That's like a crucially important piece of context.

3

hellibot t1_jdjnvqk wrote

I knew the question and read your very very long post about it too.

−1