Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

HayMomWatchThis t1_itasunj wrote

But has he been charged? It’s my understanding that removing the fluoride caused damage to the water system. the fluoride as well as being good for your teeth is also an anticorrosive. lowering the fluoride directly caused wear and tear on the municipal water system. He should be charged for the damage he caused.

−2

Electrical-Bed8577 t1_itbgfb6 wrote

Per the CDC, there is no evidence to support the anti-corrosive selling point. Fluoride is as corrosive to water treatment systems as other salts, sulfates and chlorides. However, there are additional additives to the precipitated (with sulfuric acid) fluoride, that will reduce the corrosion caused by the fluoride compound.

4