Submitted by seanner_vt2 t3_yiaac1 in vermont
Thick_Piece t1_iujhh6a wrote
Reply to comment by Cobdain in Accurate by seanner_vt2
The opposing view would be that progressive policies have led to vermont being a state that only the rich and large corporations can afford.
The states largest employer is the state and there is a vacuum of money leaving the state in retirement funds.
Less regulations would allow for actual starter homes and density building that is not subsidized by the state.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments