Submitted by GraniteGeekNH t3_z6wak3 in vermont
balding_dad t1_iy44t8w wrote
Reply to comment by ThisistheInfiniteIs in Bloomberg article on tearing down Vermont Yankee by GraniteGeekNH
The existing renewable options don’t actually fill the same energy niche as coal and natural gas. We still need baseload power to serve as a stable base for consumption. This company has been trying to “solve” grid storage as baseload power since 2012 and they’re still saying “two more years” (spoiler lossless energy storage is very expensive and probably thirty years away). Our existing renewables are great for variable needs but the existing options are coal, natural gas, and nuclear. For the baseload niche, that is our choice today, I choose nuclear.
ThisistheInfiniteIs t1_iy46wl7 wrote
>We still need baseload power
This is also false, first, we already have "baseload power" from Hydro-Quebec, what we need are sources that can be easily taken on and off line, which nuclear is terrible at. It is actually a liability in our future grid.
Also, everywhere else, "baseload" power stations are not going to be a part of our electric grid going forward, renewables and batteries are what is actually being built now, we have this technology today, which is much cheaper, safer, greener and easier to build than super expensive, dangerous, unpopular nuclear fission plants.
Edit: spelling
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments