Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mycophdstudent OP t1_iv3qsn5 wrote

They should build it on the NH side to better protect it from Vermont's anti-nuclear energy pressure goups.

7

Dire88 t1_iv4igxf wrote

Overall I like living in VT, but it's not just "anti-nuclear". Vermonters will cut off their nose to spite their face for anything that isn't asthetic.

That mindset has a place - billboards are gawdy and trashy - but it's expanded to a bunch of green energy initiatives. Just look at the windmill project that was denied in Windham/Grafton a few years ago - it would have been a huge benefit to the local communities but voters decided ruining their view wasn't worth it.

13

mycophdstudent OP t1_iv56odj wrote

Its It's like the people who complain about spotty cell service then vote against erecting a hilltop cell tower or complain about the lack of housing then vote in support of regulations which discourage housing development.

10

[deleted] t1_iv5iu26 wrote

[deleted]

0

Dire88 t1_iv5lew3 wrote

Oh you're an out of stater?

Your money is welcome in this conversation, not your opinion.

/s but yeah. I've never loved and hated living somewhere so much.

−1

Twombls t1_iv5vbqd wrote

No one wanted to build another one though. The energy from ca is way way cheaper.

1