Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

coopaliscious t1_ivo61zh wrote

Reply to comment by rufustphish in Why Phil Scott again? by rufustphish

He passes items when they make sense. A number of the items listed were vetoed because a lack of planning and just plain lack of foresight on their effects. They are great for headlines and usually not fundable, cause harm to Vermonters with unconsidered network effects or he's going to let pass once they're fleshed out ( aka the overdose sites).

17