Submitted by rufustphish t3_yqcugw in vermont
halfar t1_ivoahaz wrote
Reply to comment by Hagardy in Why Phil Scott again? by rufustphish
more important is that we get to fellatiate ourselves with the whole "See? eVeN oUr RePubLicAnS aRe GoOd!" nonsense. people look at scott with rose-tinted glasses because they want to advertise themselves as non-partisan.
flambeaway t1_ivof4aa wrote
>we get to fellatiate ourselves
You say that like it's a bad thing.
ManOfDrinks t1_ivomiz6 wrote
"I heard Vermont had slavery removed so it could suck its own dick."
halfar t1_ivqco4q wrote
"Opposing Scott is the same thing as supporting slavery"
galaxy brain take right there.
MarkVII88 t1_ivp0vs4 wrote
Is it "fellate" or "fellatiate"? Or does either term work equally well?
flambeaway t1_ivp1e1t wrote
Self blows by any other name would feel as sweet.
halfar t1_ivqbqgs wrote
Duh. We're better than misplaced sense of smug superiority.
flambeaway t1_ivs0a5h wrote
The irony in this comment is delicious. Kudos to you if it's intentional.
stinking_badgers t1_ivoeqav wrote
Maybe that’s why you do it, but don’t speak for me or anyone else. Your assumptions and opinions, no matter how cynical, are not the same as the truth.
halfar t1_ivqbd3d wrote
I'm amazed you got the impression that I support Scott from that comment.
stinking_badgers t1_ivqdgco wrote
I didn’t. I was using your clumsy formulation.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments