Submitted by rufustphish t3_yqcugw in vermont
rufustphish OP t1_ivoga1c wrote
Reply to comment by Outrageous-Outside61 in Why Phil Scott again? by rufustphish
I see you lack the empathy to realize the company owner made the choice to lay off those folks, not the government.
The owner failed to plan. No one has the right to own a business if they can't respect their workers rights.
I'm also perplexed how such a small company of 5 people would fall under this law, but I have not read it.
Not surprised you work in Agriculture with these opinions though. Seems workers rights are not respected much in that industry from my experience.
Electrical-Bed8577 t1_iwakdg8 wrote
Sounds like the child bearing couple failed to plan. Then failed to notify the very small business for six months. Or, no one wants to ag-temp? Find that hard to believe. Are we talking about more than one business here? Zzzz. Either way, should be a federal law.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments