Submitted by Crisp_Strudel t3_z5etkw in vermont
I am from Oregon, and thus I love the outdoors, accidentally stepping foot on someone’s land here is dangerous especially in this part of Oregon I’m in, we have lots and lots of public land, but almost none of it is accessible because even if someone owns a foot of land the timber trail is one they will fence it off and make it impossible to access thousands of acres of public land, it is kinda frustrating and has gotten worse
I have no intention to moving to Vermont so do not worry about a Out of stater jacking up prices, in Oregon out of starters are hated by all and I would never one to be deemed that but I love learning about freedom to roam. In Vermont, how much private land is available for walking or hiking? Is it a lot or is most land posted
dbqpdqbp t1_ixvqw9f wrote
Compared to western states, Vermont has a large percentage of private land.
However, what makes VT unique is the amount of public access to private lands. Forests in the north are comminly owned by large timber or maple companies but maintain public access easements for hiking, winter access, and permitted hunting. You'll have WMAs or state parks or town forests here and there, but only sporadically.
Similarly, most mountain biking networks traverse private lands with permission. VT has robust legislation to limit landowner liability, and we're lucky enough to have landowners excited to be a part of mountain bike networks.
The south has bug chunks of National Forest where there's tons of access. But that's a small minority of the state's area.