Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

andrews301xrd t1_j2b3q6w wrote

Maple laws extend beyond that, this product is clearly in violation because it does not include artificially flavored in it's title/primary label. Here's the applicable section of the the regulation:

All maple flavored products shall be clearly labeled on their principal display panel

or panels in a manner which will alert the purchaser to the fact that the product

is not a 100 percent pure maple product, in accordance with the Act and other

applicable statutes and regulations.

e. Artificial maple flavored products shall be clearly and conspicuously labeled on their

principal display panel or panels with the term "artificial flavor" shall be of a

size equal to, or larger than, other words used to describe the product. It is

unlawful to use the terms "maple syrup" or "maple sugar,” however modified, to

describe an artificially flavored product*. Any restaurant menu listing such a*

product, or any advertising of such a product shall clearly state that the product is

artificially flavored.

​

Paging Inspector Diego!

11