Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Khanover7 t1_j0vslgl wrote

Reply to comment by Eagle_Arm in "Dogspam" by pv_punisher

No not exactly, with your copy and paste I realized I left out my questions went to add it and didn’t copy at the end of the questions. I do think it is a SAD person that shows up on a forum to tell other people how they should interact with their animals (taking them places they are allowed calling them fur babies or parents). Why does this poster care what people call themselves or their animals. To post that people that who do this is psychotic is SAD. It’s a misuse of the word and being hateful for no reason. Why come here where people enjoyed posting pics of their dogs just to insult? So I appreciate your copy and paste because I stand by what I said.

−2

Eagle_Arm t1_j0vvay1 wrote

Using the word psychotic would be pretty spot on if saying they aren't in touch with reality, which is what they are doing. It fits that definition pretty well. Or likely, the most likely in fact, it is hyperbole, which a normal person would read it as.

Could go deeper if wanted and call it an attachment disorder. Which would bring it back to a mental disorder, not psychotic, but a form of a mental illness.

3