Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

PuddleCrank t1_j42zjlh wrote

289 was supposed to be your proposed 489, but it was never finished.

4

Emerald_196 OP t1_j42zmjq wrote

I know. I said that

−8

PuddleCrank t1_j42zwma wrote

Well, it would just be called 289 following interstate naming conventions, which you presumably know. What with showing off 489.

6