Submitted by Emerald_196 t3_10a87f7 in vermont
PuddleCrank t1_j42zjlh wrote
289 was supposed to be your proposed 489, but it was never finished.
Emerald_196 OP t1_j42zmjq wrote
I know. I said that
PuddleCrank t1_j42zwma wrote
Well, it would just be called 289 following interstate naming conventions, which you presumably know. What with showing off 489.
Buujabuu t1_j44mfcc wrote
Boom roasted
Loudergood t1_j497gvf wrote
Missed the 89 to 127 section too.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments