Anticode t1_j7mg4x1 wrote
Reply to comment by thatc0braguy in George W. Bush morning jog on September 11, 2001 by hungHub
I think you've got the arrangement of the dynamic backwards. Red states are some of the poorest in the union. I suspect that the reason why so much of the wealthy elite are conservative is a combination of...
-
The republican party is practically specifically geared towards policies that benefit the rich, obfuscated by social policies that revolve around things the voters are angry about.
-
Those least concerned with equity, empathy, and fairness are those most likely to pursue extreme wealth - and to acquire it (via variously unethical means).
I also think that having wealth also inspires people towards paranoia and fear, as they've now compartmentalized themselves from the masses and/or recognize the disparity (subconsciously or otherwise).
Like another commenter pointed out, democrats raised more money than republicans during that period of time (if you ignore the big-big contributions).
That being said, I deeply agree with you that democrats are the 'default party' and that there is no liberal party.
(Which is why I like to say that republicans/democrats are the offensive and defense lines of the elite respectively.)
thatc0braguy t1_j7mk57s wrote
I wouldn't disagree with anything you've said.
I can't say for sure, but the "why" of the poorest states voting majority for the rich man's party is because those states don't see themselves as poor Laborers, they consider themselves "future millionaires" and vote accordingly.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments