Comments
Donkeytonkers t1_jac9y4j wrote
BULLISH AF!!! Calls it is
PlaygroundGZ t1_jacbk1w wrote
n1ck90z t1_jacdbyp wrote
Anyone can be an analyst, just say random shit, change your opinion every few days, if you are wrong change it again. No need to make excuses either, people will forget, just keep the shit coming.
cletus_ t1_jacenw4 wrote
I didn’t read the article but I’m curious if anyone at JP is brave enough to attach their name to this?
Whiteguyinbronx t1_jacfkaq wrote
Lmao. I opened the article and there is in fact, no name, besides the author.
Due-Employee9272 t1_jacfotb wrote
Didn't see any names just alludes to strategists. Bit of a cop out really, put your name forward or forever hold your peace IMO
317862314 t1_jach9cl wrote
Someone should make a website that tracks analysist and what percent correct they are.
cletus_ t1_jachxt9 wrote
Was thinking the same! Tipranks remembers 😂
Economy-Assignment31 t1_jaci9d9 wrote
"Ah, yes. The market is very markety today. Many lines. Such activity."
Economy-Assignment31 t1_jacildp wrote
Also within the graph the record of Punxsutawney Phil's winter predictions to see who's more accurate: an analyst or a groundhog.
landmanpgh t1_jacit8n wrote
So the author bought puts?
mage_irl t1_jacj44f wrote
They probably exist, but why would anyone leak them
That-Whereas3367 t1_jacjmoi wrote
Tipranks is total BS. A few years ago I saw saw one guy who had about a 90% success rate. But Tipranks gave him an extremely low rating even though he had already sold the stocks (and had a sell rating) before they went down.
GoldmanSachsGary t1_jacjpex wrote
"Yes, yes, indeed we have a market. It is the market that will do market things, as you outlined perfectly. But still, despite the market conditions things will happen."
trymorecookies t1_jackh44 wrote
At this point they are just Dapper Cramer.
HeelBangs t1_jackq7q wrote
This market has sort of an oaky afterbirth
hi-imBen t1_jacl0hh wrote
your mom was risk-reward unattractive but still managed to make you.
cletus_ t1_jacl3gs wrote
Dang. Seems like everyone has an agenda and/or totally incompetent. Have to take EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE with a grain of salt.
hi-imBen t1_jacl68s wrote
probably their 2nd month in a row buying weekly puts and frustrated af that they keep getting screwed, so they wrote a little article hoping it will help.
send_bobz_plz5678 t1_jacljbc wrote
"Long term, I am predicting a move in the share price. Several moves, in fact. Short term, there is strong evidence for a change in price."
_toodamnparanoid_ t1_jaclmsx wrote
> Many lines
Calls on Cocaine!
No_free_lunch_ t1_jactmzv wrote
Buy the dip. And the next ones.
[deleted] t1_jactqie wrote
[deleted]
konstantinos2000 t1_jad32wg wrote
Intrepid00 t1_jad40sw wrote
> if you are wrong change it again
Can’t be wrong if I purge my Twitter history when I am.
unrulyropmba t1_jad5hwj wrote
Did you mean "citing" your sources? Sitting their sources?
I'd chalk this up to a simple typo but I find it hard to believe you managed to fuck up your finger placement that badly, so indicators are looking like you're a fucking mung.
PrettyDislikeMachine t1_jaelq3x wrote
Canada's banks have chief economists that rehash what is already public knowledge via Bank of Canada minutes (our Fed) and statistics data. I ask myself... how much are these guys getting paid for what really is just a marketing stunt? And how much less would I be paying in bank fees if they removed them and their respective teams that provide zero value?
Rim_World t1_jaen6zc wrote
In another news... Water is wet
[deleted] t1_jaex77o wrote
I mean, they are a bit overvalued. Look at average P/E ratio.
54321Joe t1_jaeztl7 wrote
Name checks out.
alexandertehgrape t1_jaf478w wrote
You know, this is a complicated market, lotta ins lotta outs.
VisualMod t1_jac9r6r wrote