Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

FarrisAT t1_iy908fu wrote

Fuck if Cramer kills AAPL the whole market will die

287

dabears---318 t1_iy9fzss wrote

jpow would like a word tomorrow. in fact he’s got a whole speech prepared

57

Toiletpaperpanic2020 t1_iybxkd5 wrote

"Good morning regards,

I was going going to do a .5 rate hike but you fuckers spent too much on black Friday shopping, proving there is still too much liquidity out there necessitating the need to do another .75 rate hike"

17

CryogenicEngineer t1_iy9q8yu wrote

Cant kill apple because it actually creates items of value.

7

Ravi5ingh t1_iyagv7x wrote

No it makes dildos that ppl shove up their ass screaming : OH SO ROUND AND USER FRIENDLY!!!

14

NamelessGlory t1_iyb3a5x wrote

Apple are for dumb consumers who just want surface level software, living in the walled garden (restriction prison) where you can only do things "inside the lines" drawn by apple.

16

I_drive_dick_magnets t1_iyb9oo0 wrote

As a dumb ape who has owned many iPhones, I can confirm. I just want simple because I am simple. I also look forward to seeing apple nose dive while simultaneously owning stock in them. Am dum fuk ape, i ain’t care.

10

Barachie1 t1_iyc8rgn wrote

I'm an Android user who doesn't touch iOS because of limited file access, weak breadth of available software, and limited customizability. Despite all of that, iPhones do have the best chip hardware on the phone market. That wasn't always the case, but with the M1 chip they do have a real hardware advantage in that area. More generally, if you don't care about specific software and want maximum snappiness and reliability in all situations, iPhones are probably better overall. If you need anything Android has to offer the difference in snappiness/reliability likely isn't enough to matter, but iPhones definitely have a niche/role to play.

4

-gggggggggg- t1_iyc9f8l wrote

iPhones don't use the M1 chip.

2

Barachie1 t1_iycemxr wrote

Oh yeah I'm dumb M1/M2 naming is for laptops. But they do have superior phone processors too certainly with their A- series. Like the M1 for their laptops, the phone CPU line is based on technology Apple owns and developed in-house.

In terms of raw performance they tend to win by a lot too. From Tom's Hardware comparing the Qualcomm (in the latest Samsung) to the iPhone 14 pro maxipad, "On the graphics front, the iPhone 14 Pro Max notched 12,363 or 74 frames per second on the 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark. The Galaxy S22 Ultra had a score of 9,499 and 56.87 fps. 

On our video editing test, which involves transcoding a 4K video to 1080p in the Adobe Premiere Rush app, the iPhone 14 Pro Max averaged 30 seconds. The Galaxy S22 Ultra needed 47 seconds."

iPhones also tend to have the best battery lifetime on the market for comparably powerful devices. Idk if they have super duper low power modes like some Androids though.

1

-gggggggggg- t1_iyc9d6g wrote

This was true a decade ago. Today, every major operating system on any platform is locked down and a walled garden. Windows is basically malware now with its main feature being a vehicle to host its app store and data collection services. Android today is more locked down than iOS 5 years ago. You can still find open source forks of Android, but nobody outside hobbyists uses them.

2

CryogenicEngineer t1_iybwaym wrote

Seethe at the popularity of user friendly UI. Lol

*Typed on iphone

1

Ravi5ingh t1_iyc041d wrote

The concept of user friendliness is one if the greatest misconceptions of UI design

0

mannnerlygamer t1_iycpnc7 wrote

I believe you are thinking Lovense granted it’s only a matter of time before apple acquires them

2

pvsocialmedia t1_iycm6ve wrote

Cramer for President! He might do what Jpoe hasn't been able to do yet. Kill the market to curb inflation. Edit: I was about to put a /s at the end, but if you can't figure that out.......

1

HarrisLam t1_iy8wyjy wrote

This is hella confusing when Cramer joins the equation. I would probably sit out of this one if I were you pal.

200

19Rocket_Jockey76 t1_iy8xkwp wrote

Hrs not your pal. Guy!

33

Annoying_guest t1_iy90hmi wrote

no need to be like that. Buddy.

21

ChampChange420 t1_iy90u96 wrote

Easy there friend

17

MeridianNL t1_iy97cq1 wrote

Watch it there pal!

4

ChampChange420 t1_iy97nf6 wrote

We already used pal sir

4

Ash0300 t1_iy9dq47 wrote

Bruh

5

TastyToad t1_iy95oji wrote

If you watch the clip, Cramer is being asked about Elon calling Apples' 30% appstore cut "a hidden tax". He dodges the question and chooses to rant about Elon being "as wrong as you can be", "your best quality people coming from apple" (meaning most valuable users from advertising standpoint) etc.

In other words, he's just blowing hot air, as always.

In reality, both TSLA and APPL puts will print in the incoming months. Elon will likely have to sell more stock, to finance Twitter idiocy. On top of that both companies will suffer due to recession and China problems.

edit: Too regarded to write proper sentences on first try.

22

Supra1JZed t1_iy9ca7n wrote

Well he's not wrong on the advertising logic. That's why they are Apple users, typically. Highly susceptible and influenceable.

−1

Mikerk t1_iy9fkok wrote

One thing Apple has proven is that Apple users are easily separated from their money

8

oneredflag t1_iy9tufu wrote

The entire consumer market is based on this premise...

6

zephyy t1_iybtumh wrote

Capitalism is based on this premise.

1

Supra1JZed t1_iy9jy7m wrote

100%. Some are stuck due to the insane predatory model they have. Others are clueless or blindly denying how far behind Apple is.

To be fair to a point, Apple is 1 Vs. World. They've set themselves apart and the entire world collectively is growing. They can only copy as even Apple doesn't have the money for the level of R&D the rest of the world has collectively. It's why Android has been so far ahead for so long. There's thousands of companies in that market developing.

−9

BlurredSight t1_iyaeij1 wrote

Yeah the basic WSB equation was two variables, Player * Symbol ^ -1 = Option.

Now we have (Player * Symbol ^ -1)*Player^-1 = Option * Inverse Player = Final Option.

The only difference being when adding weightings onto the variables, Jim Cramer inverse outweighs Elon Musk. But Elon's ability to go super regard on a moments notice makes the equation dynamic depending on the time of day and other outside factors.

4

Haywood_jablowmeeee t1_iybgipn wrote

Elon says AAPL is bad. Cramer says AAPL is good. But Elon has gone full Cramer the last year so that means it’s a double good vote which means bet for double bad????

1

NoobInvester018 t1_iy9ahoc wrote

Finally a worthy match, Jim Crammer's infamous kiss of death or Apple's monolithic economic/political might. Who will win?

71

SeliciousSedicious t1_iyae9k7 wrote

I think i found out how the world ends here.

Paradoxal reality ending event detected.

3

OffByOneErrorz t1_iy96ub4 wrote

On the one hand AAPL needs Twitter like the desert needs sand. On the other hand inverse Cramer.

Sweaty guy with two buttons

59

ImageCreator t1_iy8w36l wrote

Cramer isn't specifically saying Apple will surge. That phrase is fairly vague. He could be saying that Elon was wrong in his criticism because that's mean.

16

WTD_Ducks21 t1_iy9dq1i wrote

Can mods ban "inverse cramer" memes next? God this shit is so played out.

6

ViBo0467 t1_iy95wgs wrote

Positions or ban

5

phur10us t1_iy8uzbx wrote

"Elon-gated" . . . I see what you did there . . .

4

kad202 t1_iy94e5h wrote

Now I’m convince to buy puts on Apple.

Tim Cook actual name is Tim Crook all along

2

krishone t1_iy970su wrote

There goes AAPL TO $50

2

infamouscrypto8 t1_iy9sqwy wrote

Cramer is a clown and a mainstream media tool. Guy can’t or won’t tell the truth.

2

VisualMod t1_iy8ruy0 wrote

User Report
Total Submissions 0 First Seen In WSB 1 year ago
Total Comments 737 Previous Best DD
Account Age 2 years [^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) [^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.)
Vote Spam Click to Vote Vote Approve Click to Vote

^^WSB ^^Stats ^^Discord ^^BanBets ^^VoteBot ^^FAQ ^^Leaderboard ^^- ^^Keep_VM_Alive

1

Mnerdy t1_iy953i8 wrote

Definitely good 💰 💼 !

1

rkkaz t1_iy9q2b7 wrote

"elongated" lmao..

1

Meekzyz t1_iy9s1zn wrote

Im confused. Is he wrong about the slave labor/riots going on. Or just wrong for not censoring it all

1

CC7015 t1_iy9tphk wrote

Elon is just stirring shit up all over to make twitter the place to see the shit show ,

he will come back , say "Twitter is more used (by humans) than ever before" see how good I am , and then try and tuck it under the Halo mission distraction "free speech" in this case (human survival with space x and the mars mirage) (Tesla save the planet mirage)

Good enough marketing plan for me from the Elon playbook

1

Barachie1 t1_iycie0p wrote

All absolutely mirages, but Tesla is probably a net positive for the environment. Fossil fuel emissions from cars produce a lot more greenhouse gasses than the electricity used to charge Teslas (even accounting for the fact that much of that electricity comes from fossil fuels as those plants burn it more efficiently and a good chunk is from green energy). Lithium mining sucks, but it is nowhere near as significant as automobile emissions.

Again, Elon is not doing anything he does for the noble goal of saving the planet. He says whatever he wants to market his businesses (or to feed his ego/beg for attention)

1

drkaos_69 t1_iya2ubi wrote

Oh yeah, it’s put time I just went full regard

1

Dark_Tint t1_iya68tq wrote

Apple will now collapse due to the Cramer rule

1

josed2144 t1_iya812u wrote

YES!!!! It’s money time🙏

1

brainfoggedfrog t1_iyab1jy wrote

Lol cramer reminds me of that fat guy from the movie a bronx tale

1

GuhgaChad t1_iyabt2c wrote

Guh Cramer strikes again

1

Brayum_ t1_iyal033 wrote

So what kind of long puts do I need to get? Any suggestions for this re re

1

cletus_ t1_iyb0v8t wrote

Cramer makes $AAPL the new $GTW. Thanks a lot fuck fingers.

1

Clapeyron1776 t1_iyb5m2z wrote

Does it still count if Kramer is wrong for the wrong reason? AAPL stink with go done but it doesn’t have anything to do with Musk’s Twitter which is socially irrelevant now other than comic relief. AAPL will go down because China can’t make iPhones right now

1

azhiazthesky t1_iyb8dm8 wrote

Alright nut huggers, the inverse isn’t 100%.

1

yalogin t1_iyb9co9 wrote

Fuck!! This is a blow on multiple fronts. Apple is the only stock that hasn't killed me this year and I really like my iPhone. This fucker is killing both in one blow.

1

badazzcpa t1_iyba8a4 wrote

On one hand Apple doesn’t need Twitter in the least. On the other if they ban Twitter they may run head first into anti trust - Ma Bell stile. I would imagine Apple ignores Musk and keeps on printing. On a separate note the bru ha ha at Foxcom may turn into a huge headache and create a massive supply chain headache.

1

jdcl00 t1_iybw5mk wrote

If not for Jobs Apple would have rotten today !!

1

boosterish1313 t1_iyc0kgx wrote

Cramer has a really bad BS meter and can’t identify the authentic + real, once in a lifetime entrepreneur (elon) who’s actually delivering real tangible things that have or will change the world versus the total joke and frauds and freaks like Elizabeth Holmes or SBF. Emotional IQ is just off.

1

Odd-Block-2998 t1_iyc1flk wrote

Elon: going crazy

Cramer: he is crazy

It turns out that Elon is right after all. img

1

MisterAlleyCat t1_iyc1mf2 wrote

If we had to choose to have a future with Tesla or Apple, and could only choose one, which do you think the majority would favour?

1

essseker t1_iyc9h3e wrote

Both are going down

1

nyc2bad t1_iychmcj wrote

$aapl, 70% iphone comes from Foxconn....just one put reason

1

nyc2bad t1_iychwal wrote

$aapl is plug&play stuff for higher learning humans, priceless over $1500 for phone...fck put reason two

1

nyc2bad t1_iyci501 wrote

...parts from china @lowcost production, paying for an biten Apple...put that trash

1

3d-money t1_iyckjci wrote

Oh no. Fucking cramer img

1

switch495 t1_iyckjfa wrote

This is coming from a man who knows what he's talking about when it comes to 'wrong as you can get'.

1

BeerIsGoodForSoul t1_iyct6dw wrote

On one hand I can inverse Cramer. On the other hand I can inverse WSB. Either way it's going to go down, or it's going to go up, so why not both. I'm cumming with both hands on this one.

1

CLNEGreen t1_iydhbm0 wrote

J Chill needs a pill

1

downboat t1_iy9ycik wrote

Tesla Phone to the moon

0

Datum_Dude t1_iya0qca wrote

I vote to make "Elongated Puts" a WSB everyday term. I also advocate for the regular challenge to WSBetters to ask "are you elongated?" or "how elongated are you?" and to totally normalize a massive "reeeeeee" rip as an answer.

0

MrULTRALONG t1_iyalvbj wrote

So basically Elon is right? (Reverse jim creampie model)

0

EmperorPedro2 t1_iyaqvk9 wrote

Apple Vs Cramer: Immortal stock Vs accidentally reliable Prophet of Doom

0

Harucifer t1_iyarxvo wrote

Regarded AAPL fan boys vs Regarded Elon fan boys, both travelling in opposite directions at 80 mph...

0

CarwashTendies t1_iya6wbu wrote

AAPL at $150 is fine!! Do not sell AAPL! They’re fine!!!

−1

curtdept t1_iyadqug wrote

Damn Musk was right... Confirmed.

−1

Conscious-Soil9055 t1_iy8y6pe wrote

Sounds like Cramer has inside sources from Apple that others do not have. Sounds like a clear case of insider trading to me.

−3

maxx-powerz t1_iy8wm0l wrote

Does anyone think Elon is aiming for Twitter to enter into payment processing w/ crypto being the main currency? Possibly his favorite memecoin Doge?

−4

Mista9000 t1_iy8xta7 wrote

He's expressly said it in several interviews. Not crypto anything but Twitter as a payment platform.

6

bored_in_NE t1_iy91vwh wrote

Elon wants people to be able to sell items right on twitter without paying Apple 30% fee which is not going to happen. He probably thinking if he throws enough temper tantrums it will change or something and he will find out that it is not going to happen.

4

mad_king_soup t1_iy94p5x wrote

you can sell physical items through your app without paying the 30% fee. Literally every shopping app does this

6

Barachie1 t1_iyci1bk wrote

Lol. I'm just picturing this alternate reality where Fidelity, Robinhood, etc force you to pay a 30% commission to Apple if you use the iPhone app on any stock purchases.

1